From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 31 09:36:53 2021 Received: (at 51289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2021 13:36:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhB13-0000OZ-JH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:36:53 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:45406) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhB11-0000OM-NJ for 51289@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:36:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [141.226.169.107]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4DA540214; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 13:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 15:36:13 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [bug#51289] BLAKE3 reference implementation and checksum tool Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , Leo Famulari , 51289@debbugs.gnu.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GAUzkK8z+y0pSyxV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51289 Cc: 51289@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --GAUzkK8z+y0pSyxV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:13:11PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > These patches add the BLAKE3 reference implementation and a BLAKE3 > checksum tool, b3sum. >=20 > It's *very* fast, much faster than SHA256 and even BLAKE2. I'd rather not remove the development-inputs for rust-duct but other than that it looks fine to me. Didn't try building or running it though. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 = =D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --GAUzkK8z+y0pSyxV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmF+m80ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EpPw//RJF05n2G4iuX4ogfHGL0T00fuBkAWPBbA2pwHrjaQcPRO9jisLULH1ao UzixKCFxIOeXO5jBL7+IWzyINOGXV2uZrI0lYVs35IaHBtaUue5idvwQFXyhSPho H4Zq2x/VN2Qc6fobDyJ0KQ4zxEQGAZT1si0vGUlaQHIDes2S8Kja4wfGKDvybsUL VdGRUM4+Txeic5+NRehjTIO8jaUVFcOMoVaQk4N1OCyUpgevBa1lSVMJ0jjiEpzI 2wb6/y7ViBRdKmP+8XMiESkukVTHvZCaH8mUSXb+AquuKLVrGjPWXvqfnJkWHSvp UAiAszWKoHlxjrF4HlWuJGJk4TYyP099TWbbHwyFLPBa13Sf/nj7HjiVQwQa5L2I AvaCFa5xFJ9UpE1zc4+LnuYQES2DjeE8AzPOvAkU65277HQN9a0SJgTgmE67MfYC M1YX4TZTH3pRgLhdmEfOyK+MKdJ1l8KRMfkmRs4PXvp3x+yoMCsRUuwiqksPUSyI lDfuZhoqp6PryugPEmWcYOXBYMGorJhBJnBhRBVvaxUyT5ikwEGNKrNYe/Ou0pdQ jPntAbbhi6swre5aYCudDcO0EbV00o/3CyEo83VudO3bir5kU/lCXhdHb9VDD9n+ 6X0mrLk3qFHBgvfOtuGOONSXiZCq/HEBYasznHULjJLISlPj5Vc= =7Mys -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GAUzkK8z+y0pSyxV--