From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 08 12:16:10 2021 Received: (at 50960) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2021 16:16:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsXa-0002F0-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:16:10 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:44905) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsXY-0002EZ-Em for 50960@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:16:08 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1EE5C010B; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:16:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:16:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=zmpDsrVlrPlLVnoHFCMgU6CnSg9WB5GHvuAiFNtRsiY=; b=FMNW9+JjRP0Z kD0/4inY7KlcvzSf2xold8viDjN51fqil3w+nuVs2PGoUbOpseQXJUe8+iRWKxJ0 JJD8xVU5308BlusuBaHqktPiV9CVpbyfun1VI++59KDK2ovpH+8plWOkDukD7S5b XpWzwUZzqggt8x5HQwS9a0M3OuPiH6s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=zmpDsrVlrPlLVnoHFCMgU6CnSg9WB5GHvuAiFNtRs iY=; b=JtLHhf2hFwwKXCfoERl/INYFV2tWLCLBvb2bjt3682yR570EFE9tYmvwn 5UjL5SDqrCYFTK5HXB6gtvGSLQn58FJcONTHLYRnwd8xsb2BCvdSs2Y2mgFWMnQ5 DW14GsYzsneL0LIKqyT6mluHCjEJzbQ9RwAC+44kuF6zZhjWwL9anOunkBFH0rV8 LRC5DOm+o1+poyiu0Q+t2N5iM2a7aQBEXVyUxST9rvxk65dNUFldN6iZZUg7L+2R 4ysxMYDKqLaPVb/Qhrv3LY/4LJTdm8c2V1rXaMor7yAtZQWQ0PJp2ujqMeqOIjs9 XdUCgbZoEnOELRmWsVUZbMJp7JUPw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddttddgleeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesthekredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepgeejgeeghedtudfgffdutddvffefffejkeffffevffehgedvvdeutdffkeej jeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:16:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:16:00 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: [bug#50960] [PATCH 00/10] Add 'guix shell' to subsume 'guix environment' Message-ID: References: <20211002102116.27726-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87o88055d4.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87o88055d4.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50960 Cc: 50960@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 09:43:19AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > No, it’s the same. However, ‘-D’ here affects only the immediately > following package, whereas ‘--ad-hoc’ would affect every package that > follows. I must not know the correct terminology; that's what I was trying to ask. Can we keep the old behavior? Or do we think this new way of doing it is better?