From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 02 07:39:14 2021 Received: (at 50960) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2021 11:39:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58087 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWdMI-0007qD-88 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 07:39:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:38455) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWdMG-0007q0-Nq for 50960@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 07:39:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id u18so19779162wrg.5 for <50960@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 04:39:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D+NBk/yv+56WCewDkcNuUKG1f+W9MWIVFt3V7K52REk=; b=l7NteclwUpt+f0P3GOS/ERTm3CH0sKt+7kbMJGzblrUSfV4bNmGaVBguNRK54DOeGb y2VJFGCiu8bJniUjkW44zLkYBrbIsQhKBmx0g/TC6kVZ5uS1I0Z1rKu8QC5a6FynZyPu e7FcvXAZuuuE4kyyqGifN0tpE0B+DtKesyEyAY3UlqyOEi78EXi0ekcPfpIEvIgFbkXF dGvqIhuvh4tS5Px6qWMYkK7wP/d5HesAAmZYRm8fVMYMma8Pih2l8m6gdzP2aZOdeYDZ 6EC9q0J6UJqpju1oeiDCMQzM/qeFYICEcu8XyR6vPaZBtDyTbQV0hvSbLA0qGO0vdtxU kqBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D+NBk/yv+56WCewDkcNuUKG1f+W9MWIVFt3V7K52REk=; b=1D/IpIpZqIr/Wz60Imo/Do2NpYA1TtjjFn4iqpHqd56r2I+UkafnMPn4Vt0OA8pEoR oeA+yTdjjCqzn3qvfJ9ychlSOKljQ0f6ACk9UosP/u/tupYMqo2KCYmaDxLNsDHTps0R HnKB2FD9xkN/5SrKP4iRDLTGyVn4gE6MfAziLSpgTbQeLJ7+GzMKHVuB8pJUliuFxkY1 mG2Hs4/6eBV2mtCMomv3HELGMA3gLeKHPJEA67HvD1AIrx43o6YQxNZ7pplZi7v1RZ3Z wvqWMIey5A3gNTpkmF/E3Ve7epC2+M4MzjU2hD2ggYbEVKK2IrDqf73NA4wtzh5wnmld idSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oQ/3UqLoLVFom7doRY88xEM6zzHw80WXEhvccDjsZkIzeQ0U+ mtHySEYnIabltxbpxO27G9bG1dGtuXY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxd/6WTpxDOWk4TY0a5ClVOCLHHwUJ9OQ//dwvVk8Sc+6RpEa8ORpM0CJaCfpD+JEBtiQo+mQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:dc90:: with SMTP id r16mr3157803wrj.221.1633174747153; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 04:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nijino.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j11sm4349155wru.11.2021.10.02.04.39.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 02 Oct 2021 04:39:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] environment: Skip derivation computation when '--profile' is used. From: Liliana Marie Prikler To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , 50960@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 13:39:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20211002102240.27815-6-ludo@gnu.org> References: <20211002102240.27815-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20211002102240.27815-6-ludo@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50960 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Samstag, den 02.10.2021, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > * guix/scripts/environment.scm (guix-environment*): Bypass calls to > 'package-derivation' and to 'manifest->derivation' when PROFILE is > true. This only affects `guix shell' and not `guix environment', right? If not, does the outward behaviour of `guix environment' stay the same considering this patch and 07/10? There might be people relying on the way `guix environment' *currently* works, who would need to be informed about that change. Then again, if the following holds > If you run ‘guix pull’ and run again ‘guix shell’, it recomputes > the environment, as is currently the case with ‘guix environment’. then the behaviour of guix environment should also be consistent with what it did before, but with the added cache of guix shell. Am I reading this correctly? Regards, Liliana