From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 08 14:47:07 2022 Received: (at 50833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jul 2022 18:47:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33174 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9t0N-0001tn-2x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:47:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:27242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9t0L-0001tD-DI for 50833@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:47:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 56f191dd; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 20:46:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20190914; bh=LGbOvcqjzzdHR49OgaAuPfed5+jS+koTFTyuIreYMUY=; b=sc8 Ph/kn0YzPoGgicgxsGKI/gJPVaK9/Zixy2pMST7zekUzL/yZH3RzsoKqvAfU3Oea LdBfEF9tinwiAxYabPnVtDnSV8w5k7UYXDqV0+5Juf642UQyPChr0YK1e3MbjAHj d/hPYIkZPW3/fyOgXCkS/mz0OFsFGkesYtxyHtLeh4lIoVSLKg7UFYDCQb/Aya+a 2lx9BzPDyN6vd70TzOCUyiZqUctCZ6zarSK4y33XXNg5mEa4buJWtEjkSsjLB2wk FS9dw6xuqaiHRjyqIfABrRM1kZfhY5jRWOCBeK4RRnGl4PiIxxJyvCW3/OwmheT2 pDuozWUnNfRNo2G+w3Q== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 078519e2; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 20:46:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0d215bfe; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 20:46:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 5fa504f1 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 8 Jul 2022 20:46:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 13:47:01 -0500 Message-ID: <20220708134701.GB20435@gac> From: jgart To: Munyoki Kilyungi Subject: Re: [bug#50833] [PATCH] Add Bower (notmuch curses email client) In-Reply-To: <86edyvq4fp.fsf@bonfacemunyoki.com> References: <20210926190836.GB8410@gac.attlocal.net> <20210926231145.18651-1-jgart@dismail.de> <864ka6vnkv.fsf@mgsn.dev> <20210928211220.GB21136@gac.attlocal.net> <868rzdtrxv.fsf@mgsn.dev> <20211025003258.GB16646@gac.attlocal.net> <87h7d5l29p.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <878rrzwjj1.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <20220505143110.GB5411@gac> <87o7y0ztse.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <20220707192306.GV1675@gac> <86edyvq4fp.fsf@bonfacemunyoki.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50833 Cc: 50833@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Sarah Morgensen , Maxim Cournoyer , jgart via Guix-patches via X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, 08 Jul 2022 13:33:46 +0300 Munyoki Kilyungi wrote: > jgart via Guix-patches via > anaandika: > > [...] > > > > > So, I should just patch lynx then, or also other things on that list? > > > > btw, bower is currently available from guixrus: > > > > https://git.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/guixrus/tree/master/item/guixrus/packages/misc.scm#L143 > > > > I also maintain the nix package for bower: > > > > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-22.05/pkgs/applications/networking/mailreaders/notmuch-bower/default.nix#L34 > > > > > I might stop maintaining the nix package since it's not as exciting work as maintaining the Guix package and I think I don't have time for that anymore ;() > > > A bit of yak-shaving here, but why would you want > nix+guix on the same system? Sometimes nix has a package that guix doesn't have and it might take a long time to package it for Guix properly so I just install it immediately with nix (think escape hatch).