From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 01 05:16:40 2021 Received: (at 50563) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2021 09:16:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54665 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWEem-0007VO-OQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 05:16:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55960) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mWEel-0007VC-1F for 50563@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 05:16:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60734) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWEee-0000zN-AC; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 05:16:33 -0400 Received: from 2a01cb000492e90078753f5c96c7583f.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr ([2a01:cb00:492:e900:7875:3f5c:96c7:583f]:44064 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mWEeU-0000Uk-TM; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 05:16:32 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Josselin Poiret Subject: Re: bug#50563: [PATCH [0/2] gnu: GDM: Add Wayland support References: <_O63PhtCI8ZiwBgDZppLf6SqqIgEm3Y0iFYKUIsuLOeAM4yMfbqumjltWSuHKl8tfgUdL0yAC2TVR4nqKvLNJ18Rgs7iImwzPAztAEvIcmM=@jpoiret.xyz> <875yuhqjp0.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 09:16:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Josselin Poiret's message of "Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:56:21 +0000") Message-ID: <87v92hp0kb.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50563 Cc: "50563@debbugs.gnu.org" <50563@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > the default `xinitrc`. The check for the `gdm` user is that the GDM graphical > display is launched through... GDM itself, and thus is handled like the other > Wayland sessions; but since the `gdm` user doesn't have a login shell, this > wouldn't work. I see that for explaining! This would deserve a comment I think, could you please send a v2 for the second patch? That's unrelated, but what's your take on enabling wayland by default on GDM, like some other distributions? Just ran a quick search and it looks like it could be problematic for Nvidia users. Thanks, Mathieu