Hi, Lars-Dominik Braun writes: > Hi Sarah, > >> Is the Khronos Group one better, such that there's no reason to keeping >> ocl-icd? (The README for ocl-icd states "[t]his package aims at >> creating an Open Source alternative to vendor specific OpenCL ICD >> loaders." Is the Khronos Group one similarly not vendor-specific?) > I’m not really sure which one is “better”, but the Khronos-loader > is vendor-independent like ocl-icd, so there’s no real reason to > keep two imho. > >> If so, would you consider replacing ocl-icd with it in >> core-updates-frozen, since it and its dependents are currently broken? > Ludovic actually merged master into core-updates-frozen yesterday, so > this issue should be resolved. Unfortunately the CI is going to take > some time to catch up, so we don’t know yet whether that was successful. > > Cheers, > Lars Since we already have opencl-icd-loader deprecating ocl-icd in the frozen branch (see commit 4d1157fca7), let's drop this change for now. Thank you, Closing. Maxim