From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 03 14:46:34 2021 Received: (at 50105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2021 18:46:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMECw-0005tq-BA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 14:46:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMECu-0005tf-UY for 50105@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 14:46:33 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMECp-0008GP-JG; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 14:46:27 -0400 Received: from 91-170-44-245.subs.proxad.net ([91.170.44.245]:41846 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMECp-0006Zd-9u; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 14:46:27 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#50105: [core-updates] Python sitecustomize issue. In-Reply-To: <87tuj1bs6p.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Fri, 03 Sep 2021 11:21:50 -0400") References: <878s0zoz98.fsf@gnu.org> <87y28dbu1z.fsf@gmail.com> <87tuj1bs6p.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:46:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87fsulqyyn.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50105 Cc: 50105@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello Maxim, > OK, nevermind, I found that the test case was deleting the 'fix-tests' > build phase from glade3, and building the package. I confirm the fix > works! Great, that's exactly what I was trying to test but you beat me to it :). I'll be afk for a month so I won't be able to confirm that I have the same result locally. However, this fix looks good to me. Thanks, Mathieu