From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 14 14:30:07 2021 Received: (at 49921-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 19:30:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxDV1-0005SG-Fi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:30:07 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:53365) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxDUw-0005QC-7g for 49921-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:30:06 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF953200F9F; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:29:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:29:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=OVEXGNOzkHuG08j+QH/zmc2Q +1uI7We3ieJGpCiY1kg=; b=mKN2AOv5I7nbAZVl346cFrE9WNBGz2al0+D2vP+g RQDElde1Ki3wDWYGjfPaa14q9PArdUsuAF7aeZHuO6azBcUvOkMrtZiUCnDuDm9B qCAj2Uh0kjpBhda3FvAJu51iho8RAOe64CXwSKPgQJhdgJW2T4NDuk03UgNV77/W LKc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=OVEXGN OzkHuG08j+QH/zmc2Q+1uI7We3ieJGpCiY1kg=; b=ekJVeOej0qP6gjxOZ9o8nJ rJ+firbLnRWfrmcenZ8QPywtvMK3nRpycE/mvhHAzGhXQCfLSQ7rXljg1avFF5fo drepjxaqa7vGlajwuOduFU3vsmlOuv6qhvOdwcOat5vYGoPwr//398Uz44YVnoAd z/uwPklqK3o+6Wc4rPwOYAc+jC7FqKslL2sYkt31L1g9GC3TC/s6ALUtyDm3LoaT w9ahRIAX3HBJz6XAnOhL0qr2oWAO7F2suvRjUouWJ4jC25AwWjJQmzwXB8McRpOx VPkbVjS+C9R/nFEvtlS4p7XtQ3Rxs1iJoGMZs68jjV9TOIs7tJrurkqaQAJEDygQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgdduvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvddvudegffefiedttdfhfedvuefhgf ekieekgeekveetgefhfeetgfegueduffeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfh grmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:29:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:29:51 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Sarah Morgensen Subject: Re: bug#49921: go-1.16 build failing on aarch64: "fatal error: runtime.newosproc" Message-ID: References: <861r75j164.fsf@mgsn.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <861r75j164.fsf@mgsn.dev> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49921-done Cc: 49921-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 10:04:19PM -0700, Sarah Morgensen wrote: > I just noticed go-1.16 is failing on aarch64 [0]. I am not having any > success tracking down the cause. It looks like the error is the same as > was happening for go-1.14 circa 11 Mar [1], which was fixed by 9 Apr > [2], but I cannot tell what resolved the issue. I've attached the > relevant part of the build log; the full log is available at [0]. I was able to build Go 1.16 on aarch64-linux, by building this derivation "by hand" on the Berlin server. It was offloaded to real aarch64 hardware. /gnu/store/jgbp8bpi86is2y620wqais904lvjmvj8-go-1.16.11.drv https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1952349/details If I understand correctly, we have totally disabled the aarch64 emulated builds. They were problematic and I think that we should not re-enable them. So, I'm closing this bug. Please let us know if you think it should be re-opened.