From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 02 06:27:19 2021 Received: (at 48587) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2021 10:27:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34923 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzGOF-0000tC-CA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 06:27:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:36394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzGOC-0000sj-TA for 48587@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 06:27:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id m41-20020a05600c3b29b02901dcd3733f24so8735723wms.1 for <48587@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 03:27:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AO6gPbW1fdaM6Qy/HvDtzovYeM0sZn3H60qrRU8hQGI=; b=M0eGppBUbdvbKT63VVT4QnIEGSb0EtyC2FEKs/YSBKs99dI1th6m8shGYv4Nfenl+q DqYSqNRW1BWV6QUWrCUozmxjGUCCOhmMwKqKNcVC1JeIuEqnZqs4Ih2zwE8N/ImtuLRb UQOyeaohsbBMPadSKaCE9f0+da4O/a47PAAt5bxUYcRR5jCY7aZlKxVcra16jlzeVIzF IQeYCTEhGGzbUDA58JzwoOhpd1McAyIgXConS/5uW/bmOMfHXQszy6ekGkEko4AmVAzs CjUTvz2muJICDEoQLJ1SDtW4pF7h+TOsd47Xfd6v3FYcQOAOfiCyVZgFL/p84VFBHRjn eN6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AO6gPbW1fdaM6Qy/HvDtzovYeM0sZn3H60qrRU8hQGI=; b=GAo4YuqRnciaBLd7U+SE5GCB1xwx7FLGeqwJcIl4GE/AG84Opg2KIUWyDc6yjHWkIE nf09lhN8byRbPlSHex8qy6P9Rz7+CdMSayzqolw0mHc/rPAvGd8oAbsrcArn9AP/QmSj RX0f1LT5X/g0hylFhHuUUW6UiDJwWxZYp4IRT5Pc8b3WAWUUROmwQX55MCL+sw8GtswE vKATaOD/a/y4Hcm8t3ySJDKcwbf/ZPgRaOHotywKQLjnCB9W61hT4tBncQWy1XV1b5zO xNamVJ55mdO8UXsjtK5JfvL53VCEILEnywJeJyunKRs25bb9DLno4g3qdR7a9iFc9Sid omgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530icJyiD/4CKK1DASvCCXleG/3CiblutTKNcMahp1sWyfrDbAj7 5+tnVBNXi8O3O1bHzs95jYKmiFag6hg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzw1e8uu5qYBUjEt3vI+6Dg9DuPypRYfs933Wv5dx/h9JTKDZYxBG+cVNP3WOeFdr6Ranpsww== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc8f:: with SMTP id p15mr8857700wma.19.1625221631083; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 03:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm2524637wmk.18.2021.07.02.03.27.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 Jul 2021 03:27:10 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: "Emanuele M. Monterosso" Subject: Re: bug#48587: Amule 2.3.3 References: <87tumupvfp.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:42:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tumupvfp.fsf@gmail.com> (Emanuele M. Monterosso's message of "Sat, 22 May 2021 18:47:22 +0200") Message-ID: <874kdooael.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 18:47, "Emanuele M. Monterosso" wrote: > Amule has released version 2.3.3 a few months back fixing some bugs and > preventing some of the more commonly encountered crashes. So [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.45 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48587 Cc: 48587@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 18:47, "Emanuele M. Monterosso" wrote: > Amule has released version 2.3.3 a few months back fixing some bugs and > preventing some of the more commonly encountered crashes. So [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.45 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi, On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 18:47, "Emanuele M. Monterosso" wrote: > Amule has released version 2.3.3 a few months back fixing some bugs and > preventing some of the more commonly encountered crashes. Something in > the build system has changed, I believe pkg-config and thus guix fails > to automatically build it. Using 3694c0d, the substitute is available, i.e., it is built. :-) --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix weather amule calcul de 1 d=C3=A9rivations de paquets pour x86_64-linux=E2=80=A6 recherche de 1 =C3=A9l=C3=A9ments du d=C3=A9p=C3=B4t sur https://ci.guix.gn= u.org... https://ci.guix.gnu.org 100.0 % des substituts sont disponibles (1 sur 1) au moins 17,3 Mo de fichiers nar (compress=C3=A9s) 23,1 Mo sur le disque (d=C3=A9compress=C3=A9) 0,220 secondes par requ=C3=AAte (0,2 secondes en tout) 4,5 requ=C3=AAtes par seconde 6 constructions dans la queue aarch64-linux : 6 (100.0 %) vitesse de construction : .00 constructions par l'heure aarch64-linux=E2=80=AF: 0.00 constructions par heure x86_64-linux=E2=80=AF: 0.00 constructions par heure i686-linux=E2=80=AF: 0.00 constructions par heure recherche de 1 =C3=A9l=C3=A9ments du d=C3=A9p=C3=B4t sur https://bordeaux.g= uix.gnu.org... https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org 100.0 % des substituts sont disponibles (1 sur 1) 4,3 Mo de fichiers nar (compress=C3=A9s) 23,1 Mo sur le disque (d=C3=A9compress=C3=A9) 0,117 secondes par requ=C3=AAte (0,1 secondes en tout) 8,5 requ=C3=AAtes par seconde (informations sur l=E2=80=99int=C3=A9gration continue indisponibles) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Even, the package seems reproducible: guix build amule guix build amule --no-grafts --check Last, running: guix environment --pure --ad-hoc amule -- amule seems to work. Could you provide more details about what fails? Thanks, simon