From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 06 09:48:07 2021 Received: (at 48237) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2021 13:48:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52454 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNEyl-0003oI-5b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 09:48:07 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:39748 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNEyi-0003nf-1h for 48237@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 09:48:05 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1630936076; bh=OODps0DE29Q0HFiuZ7HKG6wLBCkc416BgA+5uJ/bE+w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=YP2XcHPa63t2VsKLvpdEoq+VW/l/8opTKxHY1vFPNaP18XVlAPC5N0pENhl5k+edD lQHXgMH8vr9AWb2aFr9PouWVVu0xzJbpoAA8thfe2I/nwEStOcJSkgV5WlojsCaGbS t6tfbk1kpXtx4BMFiGJsGHlBNxQopRHHRdbZnRK0= To: Arun Isaac , Leo Prikler , 48237@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#48237] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-consult: Add =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98emacs-ve?= In-Reply-To: <87pmukuhsf.fsf@systemreboot.net> References: <87k0oa4o7h.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <871r9kl1tr.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87pmukuhsf.fsf@systemreboot.net> Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 15:47:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87v93d24tx.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Wed, Aug 11 2021, Arun Isaac wrote: > Hi all, > > I actually think we should not add emacs-vertico to the > propagated-inputs, and remove emacs-flycheck and emacs-selectrum as > well. All these are optional dependencies, and we should l [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48237 Cc: Maxim Cournoyer X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Wed, Aug 11 2021, Arun Isaac wrote: > Hi all, > > I actually think we should not add emacs-vertico to the > propagated-inputs, and remove emacs-flycheck and emacs-selectrum as > well. All these are optional dependencies, and we should l [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 11 2021, Arun Isaac wrote: > Hi all, > > I actually think we should not add emacs-vertico to the > propagated-inputs, and remove emacs-flycheck and emacs-selectrum as > well. All these are optional dependencies, and we should leave it to the > user to install the ones they want. At least in this specific case, the > three packages (flycheck, selectrum and vertico) are the kind the user > would want to explicitly install. They aren't backend libraries that > ought to remain invisible to the user. > > In fact, this is the version of emacs-consult I have installed in my > profile. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (package > (inherit emacs-consult) > (propagated-inputs `())) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Also, byte compilation works for me without any propagated inputs. Am I > missing something? Another option would be to define package variants of =E2=80=98emacs-consul= t=E2=80=99, that way we would have four packages: * emacs-consult; * emacs-consult-flycheck; * emacs-consult-vertico; and * emacs-consult. WDYT? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmE2HAoVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5a7EP/jJKHMjdr7YXL2VWkx82GjajqsW8 4K5pAUJGZQ8qpJOFGdS6N0/CbHv0pwLzwyKsODpbLs4Uqj4UhlhBQWmCOSrIQEQJ lTQ3C1Cl9WEeJO2AkUBfFanX8aMsZowFXezV5JXWYt7gGs5oSUF79tOF1xi2LwUb d2bGvWcFnffjS5sUvpSWoDq2vQadDRCU4vVuFZJJmvdMGw0yjLTe9tMOH4kQOir+ yS5i+PbRleumCLnj4+ovSzJCOOJJpNydvfadTUq7vtV9a3RMh9GLmZN44YC57nie X9L0VHeHVniBs/HzwW0BqgO/gDN6W6pfJD/C7aYTmnDa2+Ar2u2EluaHaBl/DeI5 gp27EcgB/Yca7uG3up2ZcwBVDcVEDzK6gCcNcXcGNO8xEekC9uzAPiHREJHq+W3K xgqB90lfogU9rQ+eTzZpcd4W28j7MjNXBKoBMez6Tru8cVaI+7G+quslwvmCn6sX 12oLw/mgwHwKTi34obn3bbSOaI0fOP6oATzGbXyXa/1Wy2j7jyru3ww0reLhLVZD ah8HATZi45jfeV2xvo1Q8PqTH/P3U6idOv9T5J0haNCDLELvi0Qbe4Nt59IsFUk4 zfcnXheUDVO+ehbi2rndK4Je3p334oPGw0CfVsirk1GOWSR/SqmHVHtN0j/acES6 eHAp7BFjTsJVAYHn =wNmP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--