From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 26 15:33:44 2021 Received: (at 48039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2021 19:33:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lb6zH-0001z7-Nl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:33:43 -0400 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:38395) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lb6zF-0001yu-Ml for 48039@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:33:42 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01DA1695; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:33:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:33:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=ptudnDfpAcJFisMawnCS7xWEeaTyfJ89SkuYX3Hvor8=; b=vnxgdDSnOTWc lwXzHC7wgHiAPTUCju03rdMvl43wSo6b+0gjXcM0VdG5ofT1Oq//wkcsu8YACLLM ErmTCccGfjaBuDno7p4FSwN5izjwB+Pd4X6P171iioylT0xABQsJROpiS6hQ+w3g GYLJFElJsvE27OrA3gu+bQQXSCxB6B0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ptudnDfpAcJFisMawnCS7xWEeaTyfJ89SkuYX3Hvo r8=; b=syzeq0SiUTcUbUqd/bBay4OC4lP043PLnQDI4pFnCF5X9an9OyigstCcx EJ0RcZJSc9VYwXUeLZTAY9ZjdBoHlFwBzDWOA0O6LTKhbrszfWdqgegXS7dbVqbf n1nK0w/NmOtCmy5CokCo2pHeX6j8gzG0kTTF3JqTCm7KJjTTY7bJ76D8G7wlHMeA bedowfVJ7MrcwFKyZ1fPa5j7RuXOx6MIFHRYXGAErVwNS6WqqWoFCEVZaG1pgZjp Ww+LC8NHLvyTHVqI+6g9FJRnT5yd3LniPSvJMJvJy9/n/bePEuDawRjETDVJf6IE mxyuG8JRSc3z12sYawXYjyz3h0bYw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdduledgtdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtke ertddttddunecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegieelteeuuedujeehfefhtddugf effeehuedtueevfefhhffffffgveeileduhfenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucfkphepuddttddruddurdduieelrdduudeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:33:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:33:33 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=F2?= Balzarotti Subject: Re: bug#48039: xorg-server might be vulnerable to CVE-2021-3472 Message-ID: References: <878s55rm9c.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8735vcsxxt.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8735vcsxxt.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48039 Cc: 48039@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Nicol� Balzarotti wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 07:25:35PM +0200, Nicol� Balzarotti wrote: > >> * gnu/packages/xorg.scm (xorg-server): Update to 1.20.11. > > > > Did you see ? > > > Ops, sorry for the duplicate, I somehow missed it, I'm closing this I didn't mean for you to close your message. We took different approaches to fixing the bug: I applied a patch, and you updated the package. The big difference is that your patch doesn't avoid changing the xorg-server-for-tests package, so it can't be applied to master. I'm merging the two tickets. I think that updating the package is a better choice that simply patching it. I'll probably join our two patches together and push that.