From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 07 15:05:49 2021 Received: (at 48028) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2021 19:05:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45453 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lf5nI-00021e-R0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 15:05:49 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:61667) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lf5nE-00021W-1c for 48028@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 15:05:47 -0400 Received: from nijino.local (91-114-247-246.adsl.highway.telekom.at [91.114.247.246]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FcKfD1Sbwz1DH72; Fri, 7 May 2021 21:05:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4FcKfD1Sbwz1DH72 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1620414340; bh=ImxC8PSn+01GZJ9bXNFW1j9TQOHtMk3FmdaUjow2eio=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iDVvpdOiYh+AjySpKoQYH55MvLj8vPxwAsxXbx5Yk/i/ZKFa5igU80PeTtcBbd4Mo YiZvdH9Gx56vfqMLt4F9KtO6SOu/Rav4nkBKI4ug6N+/0ZAOEm4Jatx0rLv6+owwMU BVQbaq5DbeP9EAaNKw5kk8yvi1CiKm/nnyJa7XYs= Message-ID: <1d59df5ebeb2ffa8b836eedbb200f43637e04ace.camel@student.tugraz.at> Subject: Re: [PATCH wip-gnome v4 3/8] gnu: gtkmm: Add missing native-input and correct propagated-inputs From: Leo Prikler To: Mark H Weaver , Raghav Gururajan , 48028@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 21:05:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h7jel73m.fsf@netris.org> References: <20210426081145.28926-1-rg@raghavgururajan.name> <20210426081145.28926-5-rg@raghavgururajan.name> <73660fda850714bb152afc392df78addecd29932.camel@student.tugraz.at> <88a82777-3c12-58d6-912f-196ea150f772@raghavgururajan.name> <610e1f33a099e2b8fad8f5df21447f9108082a9c.camel@student.tugraz.at> <878s55j6sy.fsf@netris.org> <0af67af0-9649-13f6-6740-60b8cc05ee1f@raghavgururajan.name> <87czufqtxj.fsf@netris.org> <8a488be7-93e0-b453-d3a4-abe7f2343533@raghavgururajan.name> <4d4acdb7-224b-e389-3d85-bbbdf6eb6e3b@raghavgururajan.name> <3f522fca-ff33-6057-bae2-bfd9a4282125@raghavgururajan.name> <87h7jel73m.fsf@netris.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48028 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Am Freitag, den 07.05.2021, 14:40 -0400 schrieb Mark H Weaver: > Hi Raghav, > > Raghav Gururajan writes: > > > I just realized packages that depend on gtkmm, doesn't propagate > > it. So > > only way gtkmm, ends up in user-profiles is when explicitly > > installed. > > Thus conflicts doesn't happen while building profiles right? > > You might be right for users who only install user applications. > > However, if I understand correctly, with the v4 patches that I looked > at > earlier, and presumably also the v5 patches (based on what you > wrote), I > guess that conflicts _would_ happen if someone tries to install > 'gtkmm' > and 'cairomm' together in the same profile. It would be good to make > that work properly, by selecting appropriate versions of these *mm > packages that are compatible with each other. > > What do you think? > > Regards, > Mark As an addendum to what Mark said, I think this could be achieved by temporarily hiding the variants of atkmm, cairomm, etc. that are supposed to go with the yet unpackaged gtkmm and perhaps doing a round of variable renames, so that those using manifests won't be screwed either.