From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 18 12:41:07 2021 Received: (at 47852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2021 16:41:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47580 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYATr-0007aX-F9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 12:41:07 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:57722 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYATp-0007Zt-Q2 for 47852@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 12:41:06 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1618764057; bh=j6fUJ7R6nfL4Vqos/e7L1OZSz/Rca7Teo8qdHKljUTA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=AqD2uLwVat8RPTpbqbj5iXzD5CklzxKYFoZMP/R4/O9CcaSW9W0RxTfZQmS/q9c1M zrdQyZcbyqxG4rmqVT1Rl/1PX96fJuYRYXZ2c12M2Gu0HqYosdkwXZGe/hiRPEnla0 kR9XB062os7NwshM6w4VqkvDtTR4LNtStOSepnG0= To: jgart , 47852@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#47852] [PATCH] gnu: Add sc-im In-Reply-To: <2743aa1f4e3f66ba04fb1bf34a566cad@dismail.de> References: <87r1j8djw7.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <15c0925b25d9950553a55a4881922cc4@dismail.de> <9635b393f2e4e1787a99c8f6ee2d3c43@dismail.de> <2743aa1f4e3f66ba04fb1bf34a566cad@dismail.de> Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 18:40:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87lf9feeb8.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Sun, Apr 18 2021, jgart wrote: > I appreciate your review. I attached an updated patch with your > suggestions. Thank you for pointing those out. Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.2 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47852 Cc: Raghav Gururajan , jackhill@jackhill.us, raghavgururajan@disroot.org, Oliver Loaiza , hello@elenq.tech X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Sun, Apr 18 2021, jgart wrote: > I appreciate your review. I attached an updated patch with your > suggestions. Thank you for pointing those out. Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.2 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD Hi, On Sun, Apr 18 2021, jgart wrote: > I appreciate your review. I attached an updated patch with your > suggestions. Thank you for pointing those out. You are welcome! > I moved home-page closer to the top so that I can reuse it in the url > field. Good idea. >> I suggest adding it to (gnu packages terminals) instead of creating a >> new file. You will find asciinema and fzf there. > > I'm not sure if it makes sense to me for sc-im to go into terminals. > > It seems like terminals has mostly terminal emulators. > > Like I pointed out in my previous email, why wouldn't calcurse and > visidata also go into the terminals module? I don=E2=80=99t know why those two programs are in their own files, but aft= er taking a closer look, I found that some programs are put in different modules based on the program=E2=80=99s purpose. For example, bashtop, htop= , and nnn all go in (gnu packages admin), and neomutt/mutt are put in (gnu packages mail). By that logic maybe it would make sense to put sc-im in (gnu packages maths) or (gnu packages statistics)? > sc-im is a spreadsheet program for the terminal in the same way that > calcurse is a calendar program for the terminal. In the same way that asciinema is a screen recorder for the terminal ;) > Maybe we can do a clean up soon and put all these programs in a new > module? That would probably be a good idea. The way packages are categorized is still a little confusing to me. :)