Hi, On Sun, Apr 18 2021, jgart wrote: > I appreciate your review. I attached an updated patch with your > suggestions. Thank you for pointing those out. You are welcome! > I moved home-page closer to the top so that I can reuse it in the url > field. Good idea. >> I suggest adding it to (gnu packages terminals) instead of creating a >> new file. You will find asciinema and fzf there. > > I'm not sure if it makes sense to me for sc-im to go into terminals. > > It seems like terminals has mostly terminal emulators. > > Like I pointed out in my previous email, why wouldn't calcurse and > visidata also go into the terminals module? I don’t know why those two programs are in their own files, but after taking a closer look, I found that some programs are put in different modules based on the program’s purpose. For example, bashtop, htop, and nnn all go in (gnu packages admin), and neomutt/mutt are put in (gnu packages mail). By that logic maybe it would make sense to put sc-im in (gnu packages maths) or (gnu packages statistics)? > sc-im is a spreadsheet program for the terminal in the same way that > calcurse is a calendar program for the terminal. In the same way that asciinema is a screen recorder for the terminal ;) > Maybe we can do a clean up soon and put all these programs in a new > module? That would probably be a good idea. The way packages are categorized is still a little confusing to me. :)