From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 16 17:55:08 2021 Received: (at 47756) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2021 21:55:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41891 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXWQe-0005qD-B4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:55:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39348) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXWQc-0005pc-KL for 47756@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:55:07 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXWQW-00044Z-6q; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:55:00 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=40596 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lXWQV-0007XL-II; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:55:00 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Xinglu Chen Subject: Re: bug#47756: [PATCH] gnu: guile-git: Update to 0.5.0. References: <9456fb365b313b1553317db1cccdedcf58e29182.1618340546.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <8735vtj2hv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2dlgh8q.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 23:54:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2dlgh8q.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> (Xinglu Chen's message of "Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:53:09 +0200") Message-ID: <87wnt128ul.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Xinglu Chen skribis: > On Tue, Apr 13 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I pushed that update independently as >> c2e83b71054f953953711e027f863d6c75c6ddb2. > > Oh, cool. > >>> I used ‘git-fetch’ because it i [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47756 Cc: 47756@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Xinglu Chen skribis: > On Tue, Apr 13 2021, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I pushed that update independently as >> c2e83b71054f953953711e027f863d6c75c6ddb2. > > Oh, cool. > >>> I used =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99 because it is more flexible than =E2= =80=98url-fetch=E2=80=99, users >>> can for example use package transformations to easily use a desired >>> commit/branch. >> >> I agree this is desirable. I didn=E2=80=99t do that because I thought i= t might >> be a case where we need Guile-Git for =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99, but I= think I was >> wrong (I was confusing with Guile-Zlib, which we cannot obtain via >> =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99 because =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99 uses it.) > > Yeah, =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99 in (guix build git) runs (invoke "git" = args ...), it > doesn=E2=80=99t seem to have any dependency on Guile-Git. > >> So after all, maybe we can use =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99? > > I think that would a good idea. :) Done in 7a6625e83f68f6408ff0a82b12e7a95c6b0cc096! Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.