From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 13 17:31:28 2021 Received: (at 47756) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2021 21:31:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32798 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWQd5-0005SP-MG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:31:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWQd4-0005Mx-BN for 47756@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:31:26 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWQcy-0001Im-8B; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:31:20 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60394 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lWQct-0000BL-52; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:31:16 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Xinglu Chen Subject: Re: bug#47756: [PATCH] gnu: guile-git: Update to 0.5.0. References: <9456fb365b313b1553317db1cccdedcf58e29182.1618340546.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:31:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9456fb365b313b1553317db1cccdedcf58e29182.1618340546.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> (Xinglu Chen's message of "Tue, 13 Apr 2021 21:22:44 +0200") Message-ID: <8735vtj2hv.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi! I pushed that update independently as c2e83b71054f953953711e027f863d6c75c6ddb2. Xinglu Chen skribis: Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47756 Cc: 47756@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Hi! I pushed that update independently as c2e83b71054f953953711e027f863d6c75c6ddb2. Xinglu Chen skribis: > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-git): Update to 0.5.0. > [source]: Use =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99 instead of =E2=80=98url-fetch= =E2=80=99. > [native-inputs]: Add autoconf, automake, and texinfo. > --- > I used =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99 because it is more flexible than =E2= =80=98url-fetch=E2=80=99, users > can for example use package transformations to easily use a desired > commit/branch. I agree this is desirable. I didn=E2=80=99t do that because I thought it m= ight be a case where we need Guile-Git for =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99, but I th= ink I was wrong (I was confusing with Guile-Zlib, which we cannot obtain via =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99 because =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99 uses it.) So after all, maybe we can use =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99? Ludo=E2=80=99.