From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 12 16:38:20 2021 Received: (at 47728) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2021 20:38:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lW3K8-0005oF-MJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:38:20 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:58371) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lW3K4-0005nw-Ok for 47728@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:38:18 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24672400E5 for <47728@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:38:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1618259887; bh=/qRp0YDpnCZ7CCbdWkAvwUp3X2lFMsvCkta0VvO/ZQc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=gJX3Dh0/nfpDqUSU1RG0jeCEqWAkSegNxWd8c+nIFMQTrCgSbpmfHnDr2+H9lAF+9 Ao8cTZ4HCOGvOhDqCvwCO6iAp2BZLiN9gYr7gx0mEa2zdxxEU0wZuJzoWG+dp39Dkj DWNo5FLGZemKme7rdK6F6NVVxG9RObnPsx2721dCoD64jAJZcONgbXRZKTSVKmdQLI leAdnVD9M288sjIXo6iH2EZi9kSlhejGMevL62zH9mUrakqPEUgy3zyVaeayCMlEd1 cfAOPe1eRewCPFu3iDYUNiU4QYz/s7pOKv5MT9SyLfN/xs8KULo+bqNaiv19WEtMer 0lNmqirNAFZQQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FK0tQ3pdzz6tmK; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:38:05 +0200 (CEST) References: <87v98r4fu3.fsf@yamatai> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.2 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Adam Kandur Subject: Re: [bug#47728] newbe question In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:38:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87sg3v44t0.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47728 Cc: 47728@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Adam Kandur skribis: > also, you wrote "fiveam" ,sbcl-fiveam > > why not "sbcl-fiveam" ,sbcl-fiveam It's because of the cl-xxx and ecl-xxx packages that are created by transforming the definition of the sbcl-xxx package to use cl-* or ecl-* packages as inputs instead of sbcl-*. If the sbcl-xxx package has '("sbcl-fiveam" ,sbcl-fiveam)' as input, after transformation the ecl-xxx package will have '("sbcl-fiveam" ,ecl-fiveam)' as inputs, which looks strange (but it will work anyway as the string is just used to reference an input in custom phases using something like '(assoc-ref inputs "sbcl-xxx")'). By using just "fiveam" as string, the sbcl-xxx package has '("fiveam" ,sbcl-fiveam)' as input, and the ecl-xxx package will have '("fiveam" ,ecl-fiveam)'. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYHSvqw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j82BQD9Fso1wfVwQzOYeeBC8GDIm73LQKRfXcvjbl9c EFA2u+kBAKeqkALjJL7PqzVCB3JFvju+/cMkwDZgibjZAjfrdgq7 =uCNx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--