From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 10 18:27:55 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2021 22:27:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53505 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVM55-00052d-14 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 18:27:55 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46390) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVM53-00052W-Rv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 18:27:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVM53-0000d4-Lg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 18:27:53 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:37508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVM51-0002Un-ER for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 18:27:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=Qhv2GwV08v+bn9QXt030hmi6rTEPdzpbfcnNzsxs/MA=; h=date:in-reply-to: subject:cc:to:from:references; b=gXQ6/QjgOVXK9CG049XLN4gKPgEHuAfK8ZZtj GwAm/l6ufUurv/vxu9CT3uQ8NODJAtlTET2rOeBQNKY7c/wTyus03bunYtGmCqzH3QCAwu FENge6TbY/l75ATCiKcgK6ARxsmZmfimQOYh7NUh4hSkxRYIFzParjqjv2G/7AhyyLOHQk dNnOYB+RxyRb5IUwNLdDnOHf8TV1BgrotZLZadA+gjSpp8G0KMjVMY8GsEbvRVpN3EDGOW 0EkxrvzNhKsbYVPkcXSSgQNVPrSpDhjrkRg6PPH3ICf+Le5WPMXggMJV30KTTxnpUuKkfH V8ciphGdIwKaqeZiVJDrFZjjg== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 26a1c01e (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:27:48 +0000 (UTC) References: <87pmz3mr2k.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: =?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2?= Balzarotti Subject: Re: bug#47674: dnsmasq is vulnerable to CVE-2021-3448 In-reply-to: <87pmz3mr2k.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 00:27:47 +0200 Message-ID: <878s5phj18.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 47674@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nicol=C3=B2, Nicol=C3=B2 Balzarotti writes: > gnu/packages/dns.scm (dnsmasq): Update to 2.85. I see you managed to aim this beautifully between me searching the=20 issue tracker for =E2=80=98dnsmasq=E2=80=99 and me actually pushing an upda= te, so=20 well done I guess. (Also: sorry for the duplicated effort, and thanks for keeping an=20 eye on the securities. :-) Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYHImZA0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15/lYBAIdy87NnZyCQC3xB6NzcYF8sOQ8H4O1SnVDzr53e 0uhkAQDIYLIyHPJfMuKojir4w4uIJPK392rXg1fpPA4HQKmdBw== =jkh7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--