From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 09 16:07:17 2021 Received: (at 47674) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Apr 2021 20:07:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51009 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lUxPR-00025e-70 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 16:07:17 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:53667) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lUxPO-00025O-Fu for 47674@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 16:07:15 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269BE5C00B6; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:07:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Apr 2021 16:07:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=CconW5blCxK50dtXnN2qyyGMrSO3f+LzGRoe78sDtp4=; b=JOfIl5tNtVgS TSGo4vp00JEfWBh3RygCmf6KGVQERnrCzTb9oUrIH4/5a0EcUwR9Vqpxz/anvQNy LtKAcHtZB6akv9SHHLemScQ/E4/r46w9A1JaAaBNDLDcLBNOjZjWruVNDPGm0/PL AwXj1RkEWuF0X7GjnOqWvDUda3Ba3Os= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=CconW5blCxK50dtXnN2qyyGMrSO3f+LzGRoe78sDt p4=; b=LIS+IFY6g0L4Zqnn2kA6zdXHDfftaVheC4bRe+2VRDH8/HnYLb/QrMbEV xw7URBGL+tpQDL/e8jmKeUh7JmLqHPyJBJzSwjaKPEcex+PmTkZW5pHX7WEXXfFE dImoQAyoVNtK9BstriE+QXpfk1KHz2gFnn4CaQwlCZRCCtGR0iRxbSpntyeV5NT2 cd7j3NmfOQb0wFv+edkr9byunMXdGLmOKXHCB7PLMds9G/B8qdbeHbCHhaWByfq1 uRUSgCiZCLDRbL8L2zYmP5rvI1i5h1lFJhJhbOO+FJAwe1yhUBuFGs6knpecnu09 3CvB1R7lt7BWBGz4b6xVNLUlu3dPw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudekuddgudeglecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesth ekredttddtudenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhu lhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueeugedugfdvgfevuedvledule efjefhgefgjeetgfegkedukefhvdefleejhefgnecukfhppedutddtrdduuddrudeiledr uddukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C67981080063; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:07:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:07:07 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=F2?= Balzarotti Subject: Re: bug#47674: dnsmasq is vulnerable to CVE-2021-3448 Message-ID: References: <87pmz3mr2k.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87h7kfme9q.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87h7kfme9q.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47674 Cc: 47674@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:47:13PM +0200, Nicol� Balzarotti wrote: > Staging has an older version (5.8 vs 7.2, which has been released in > november 2019 [fn:1] though), and it got updated a few days ago > (28cc447fc5bd0a219ad54836a343826cc34d9bd7) if I'm not wrong, so it should > fail on staging too. Am I wrong? Ah, could be. The new staging builds haven't been performed yet.