On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:43:46PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:17:52PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For the record, changing ‘qt-build-system’ would trigger a rebuild of > > less than 400 packages according to the back-of-the-envelope calculation > > below. In that case, it’s tempting to fix on ‘master’ and include it in > > the release. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > There are a couple of other things we want to change with the > qt-build-system and the wrappers. Another one is changing the wrappers > so they prefix (or was it suffix?) QT_QPA_PLUGIN (and I think others) so > they can run natively on wayland. I think it would be a good > improvement and worth it. A quick search pulls up the following bugs: 43446 44982 45193 45221 45784. Looks like there's a lot of desire to see it adjusted. > > Ludo’. > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(gnu) > > scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix build-system qt) > > scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix) > > scheme@(guile-user)> (define qtpkgs (fold-packages (lambda (pkg lst) > > (if (eq? (package-build-system pkg) qt-build-system) > > (cons pkg lst) > > lst)) > > '())) > > scheme@(guile-user)> (length qtpkgs) > > $78 = 186 > > scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix graph) > > scheme@(guile-user)> ,run-in-store (node-edges (@ (guix scripts graph) %reverse-package-node-type) (fold-packages cons '())) > > $79 = # > > scheme@(guile-user)> (node-reachable-count qtpkgs $79) > > $80 = 180 > > scheme@(guile-user)> (+ 186 180) > > $81 = 366 > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > > > > > > -- > Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted