From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 16 13:20:19 2021 Received: (at 47539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2021 17:20:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52269 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4RVa-000579-PY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 13:20:18 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:35080 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4RVX-00056q-Lt for 47539@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 13:20:17 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1626456009; bh=mwg2xBGNGmash+SZHf0wx+4hzsAKFwBKFsdEVi/HyEU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Rp1EfIYyjZKKtX34Idq6hKOuhifjphEcDG1HtGP4Bshr7itne2O/hR/+YzFn3IDG9 mMbUvWD9yckpsy3jKEICJiN7qvZDmNdOgyA8imgPauKIEYvj0/iK8efiCMcRjIb/e1 8t2R8T0Dic/eWmOfmiMBnG7YyWTSjd+gnMpEnuOg= To: Leo Prikler , Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [bug#47539] Add github-cli In-Reply-To: References: <87y2dd8r18.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87lf9d8l43.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87mts486ln.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87pmwxu8z5.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:20:08 +0200 Message-ID: <878s26p453.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, Jul 15 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Am Montag, den 07.06.2021, 13:19 -0400 schrieb Leo Famulari: >> > So if A dependes on B which depends on C, and I want to build A, >> > then C has to be a ‘propagated-input’ for [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47539 Cc: 47539@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, Jul 15 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Am Montag, den 07.06.2021, 13:19 -0400 schrieb Leo Famulari: >> > So if A dependes on B which depends on C, and I want to build A, >> > then C has to be a ‘propagated-input’ for [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 15 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Am Montag, den 07.06.2021, 13:19 -0400 schrieb Leo Famulari: >> > So if A dependes on B which depends on C, and I want to build A, >> > then C has to be a =E2=80=98propagated-input=E2=80=99 for B? Did I ge= t that right? >>=20 >> Yes, for our go-build-system. >>=20 >> > But if I just want to build B, should C still be a =E2=80=98propagated- >> > input=E2=80=99 for B? >>=20 >> Yes, unless B is only an end-user executable, such as Syncthing. In >> that case it doesn't matter if you use inputs or propagated-inputs. > For context, I think github-cli will probably be fine using inputs > instead of propagated inputs, but the rest down the chain might need to > be adjusted. > > There has been some time since the last patch was sent and I sadly > doubt cbaines' patchwork will try to build this package. Is v3 good to > go to master? Should Xinglu send a v4? @Xinglu, are you still > interested in merging v3/creating a v4? A few weeks ago I tried to update =E2=80=98github-cli=E2=80=99 to the lates= t version, but it required some new packages to be packaged, and I got stuck trying to package one of them. I don=E2=80=99t really have much interest in packaging it (well, Go package= s in general) anymore since I rarely interact with GitHub anyway. Unless someone else would like to pick it up, I am OK with closing the bug. Sorry for not following up on this. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDxv8gVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x550sQAIU6th8xlgBZs/N3WPm8YCiProQh ZTXtETV/MX/ceFqPAN4EWJvXI2K4zrkP74X2yjk+Q4qsJYio29BR2JWIlSsKuakp 2iEjSN+AUwf0XSfRDMCruKY1FZRlFvbO6hk1A27ydvllwVGnzrWxMbw7TJkoPOS0 NqhiwPDS5kW6g8dxfXIVlY16XB1MaTPewAqUMr+4kxZ+Oqdhma8e3py2ZGTTuKgK tpuPb573Q9Ag+a4RBTxTonnt5FHjOwB27TlCPA1WpQycBIrbB3kGKnYsU1T+ssGL dmkcz97DMoVswyVltV3luInaLj/BMeX1/tF+Ri9oaid8MWSh5RwiaOpK/BdcW77q kKCnrqqNfinVaddy3S7aO8+5r3hqPD7Egl+8gRP+GgPEHov0nRKiWLEI8zdIu4LX vG8sdOPW4vbQLBMbCOtp+a7vnEoUxpYMtMuGQeMOfJeFgCeNCoCde85tkd55aZUb LQOM9WRpX5+zlcnFFBfAfJ6B9SvDVUfpjpZkXJtTfAHGUbsBqwvdqbDZRjcyKsAT hU9o9Fg3Q2iI3w1K3Vsj2ES8odpNCAJInBqYq/b8cb+YM12WoHbN0UBTMEy+EghY 9MUo6txX0YGPcGe23liqghYJVUwpFNaWcEPEIxmlh4Xibw+DNlDWi8+6DgQ2BmBb UWrSt+ONZ1hgHWhW =0Myc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--