From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 20 14:56:53 2021 Received: (at 46602) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2021 18:56:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35399 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5uvF-00065W-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:56:53 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:47620) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5uvD-00065G-Ku for 46602@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:56:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [31.210.177.125]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A838D40224; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:55:45 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0 Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , Leo Famulari , zimoun , 46602@debbugs.gnu.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CPJAVKZ+hKYwOhbY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46602 Cc: 46602@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --CPJAVKZ+hKYwOhbY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:54:03PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > Here are my notes on the users of the openssl-1.0 package: >=20 > > File: web-browsers.scm >=20 > dillo: > Does not build with current OpenSSL > Status? https://www.dillo.org/Plans.html > No dependents This one confuses me. I was able to build dillo with both openssl and openssl-1.0, but I was unable to open that page with either version. > > File: rust.scm > > File: crates-io.scm >=20 > For the Rust bootstrap, we can keep openssl-1.0 as a hidden-package. > Help wanted dealing with the crates that depend on openssl-1.0. >=20 I can poke those I guess, see what we can drop openssl-1.0 as an input for and see if anything breaks. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --CPJAVKZ+hKYwOhbY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmD3HC4ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HwLw//TET1H3APeBktxr00qIRF3REWrF6h43fro5fo/fiGyyhB88SggLjYklrZ UGdxZ8OsBr8rMGiQ4JApJVjwE8Bysq5ZHbu+4EEw79ukIZvi2DdGHyLOKb/juF3y 6Viss17qwp4po3VjuLfrp/oiSAFnUcr42RKSp/msS4CwwAbUX/exg+51nFBUM9G+ KX3W4JGdS7E3enRvvS5iLgPSVLaYNkjlE5zaiZHnpPWybZQN75mxwWZAxDSKu/T0 TwBgSzlKuoSMJBFFNLXYiPyCURw2+M5AVqVdzM3rOIbXZPMYWQmZUsliBklfJnXY sACAawxfXas7xHjJ4hUE8YOJsQvaoRgLNiBMpB+UeXP85DbYpZtYVFlIRLgF8aJ+ sW5Qf8Uq/S8SKqPkLNqqWDpKWh6/+eg78mxnHO0DAR8auO7Qa9treehjCAd8V1YX FXEIW0PF12KibFiVJXCBs+6D24MIyNfdrXcp00QRd4F/F18M5C9c8Zckmj9bTG7g bEaTzsW3CntpEaBi0NXhzivUO/Ozr0YXo51RN4Pb3eFHw7DJUCmDm7zMw+as/iPm IC/oYDT+NttWjNE5WPepRUKow094otsq1cAHSQqDPGi0rihIRvlKbObS9RB/RPHy K45SPeZAzOnUGTjpVBsSIm03b5DiCtCIhLNu1iUyRajw3VbJvVc= =XYwi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CPJAVKZ+hKYwOhbY--