Leo, Ellis, Leo Prikler 写道: > I'd like to say "use your best judgement", but you seem to be a > little > too fixated on having a minimal package description (and putting > minimal effort into it). That's uncalled for. It's certainly not the impression I get. > For instance, when the package advertises encryption, while it > is > technically optional, shipping it without gpg would be a grave > oversight! Well, that depends. My own rule of thumb for ‘foo supports encryption!’ is: $ gpg bash: gpg: command not found $ foo --encrypt error: whoopsie: BUG in do_foo()+0x4f44! <16 lines of barftrace> error: warning: error: No such file or directory. (-ERROR) $ => Make gpg an input, and quick. $ gpg bash: gpg: command not found $ foo --encrypt error: gpg not found, please install it. $ => This is totally fine, users who want it know what to do next. Kind regards, T G-R