From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 16 11:43:27 2021 Received: (at 46162) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2021 16:43:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41379 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC3Rf-00046P-Kv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:43:27 -0500 Received: from pat.zlotemysli.pl ([37.59.186.212]:52032) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC3Rd-00046D-Ez for 46162@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:43:26 -0500 Received: (qmail 2254 invoked by uid 1009); 16 Feb 2021 17:43:23 +0100 Received: from 188.123.215.55 (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat.zlotemysli.pl (envelope-from , uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-2.08st (clamdscan: 0.98.6/26075. spamassassin: 3.4.0. perlscan: 2.08st. Clear:RC:1(188.123.215.55):. Processed in 0.01484 secs); 16 Feb 2021 16:43:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat.zlotemysli.pl with SMTP; 16 Feb 2021 17:43:23 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: bug#46162: [PATCH] staging gnu: Add more tools to rust outputs. From: =?utf-8?q?Jakub_K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= To: "John Soo" Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:41:29 +0100 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <87wnv80xvv.fsf@asu.edu> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46162 Cc: 46162@debbugs.gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Tue Feb 16, 2021 at 5:40 PM CET, John Soo wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka writes: > > > I don't think tools beyond rustc and cargo should be included in the > > main rust package, as this causes them to be built in each step of the > > bootstrap. I believe a better approach would be to define separate > > packages for them. > > Yeah that would make sense. Have we explored any of the incremental or > --keep-stage options to speedup the bootstrap? apteryx mentioned some experiments with those on #mrustc. Regards, Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka