From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 27 18:04:26 2021 Received: (at 46090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2021 22:04:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQH2g-0002g4-CC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:04:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56988) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQH2e-0002fr-RM for 46090@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:04:25 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQH2Z-0001kH-MO; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:04:19 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=43690 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lQH2Z-0004ef-0f; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:04:19 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: s.karrmann@web.de Subject: Re: bug#46090: [PATCH] updated skarnet and added s6-man-pages new prjware with runwhen new mandoc References: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 23:04:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: (s. karrmann's message of "Sun, 24 Jan 2021 22:44:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87ft0gxnha.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46090 Cc: 46090@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, s.karrmann@web.de skribis: > +(define-public mandoc > + (package > + (name "mandoc") > + (version "1.14.5") > + (source (origin > + (method url-fetch) > + (uri (string-append > + "https://mandoc.bsd.lv/snapshots/mandoc-" > + version ".tar.gz")) I have just pushed a =E2=80=98mandoc=E2=80=99 package in (gnu packages man)= , partly inspired by yours here. Apologies for not looking at your patch earlier! In general, we send one patch per =E2=80=9Catomic=E2=80=9D change, which usually means one patc= h per added/updated package. The patch you sent contains a lot more, which is nice, but it would facilitate review if you could split it in several patches and with a commit log, as per: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html Could you look into it? Thanks in advance, Ludo=E2=80=99.