From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 16 01:11:20 2021 Received: (at 45911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2021 06:11:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0enw-0004uc-ED for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:11:20 -0500 Received: from sender4-of-o55.zoho.com ([136.143.188.55]:21535) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0env-0004uU-4Q for 45911@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:11:19 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610777453; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=J+DPtC/yJUSKYm7de/mMlkv8JjRsm7yVJewSIPCUZGUdB4UDFdPHpd8SNb+i1BwMRx53eqtvA1tXRe6fkpFdVYqsPsL4aU141D3juPhXqJfZ5qvemKKFPPhYeK6YAjvBySM2x/6l1HsbuIxV+YEZ+7FIH38TekXA3eQcydRe218= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1610777453; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=BCYJjzODCj9j74jF33n9ggSB/cGxHJoB+PUUCe3Qbrk=; b=EObVrO+XOh3aqzD74ixbZ+uB+Qh+/hfgqDNN0D3A26SvaXAx+WDQgae1liaPGumWYFwVTfCmAa6pyQLEXyd4StGK6A5T3dkRmKCStLCz/mdRHKA+Eh2IrYztuYddebTNXcZKGVFnAPElRhbbEwhvTJZeIXCEWYfxWEBsWsr7BBI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1610777453; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=BCYJjzODCj9j74jF33n9ggSB/cGxHJoB+PUUCe3Qbrk=; b=bzAjJqQd+uJ+Jc19DqN3QroA/hkibyD7yGV4odo49WumNr4tTb6Yue6h2fFYlrbe 6XlMfae1uuY7Mong1DCXeR4edPYBfrPc8hNI4dyRM0PZLoZvugQo8ifFdESp8bjnaRN Ci19aZwQGJ0I9rZCzjC6uZl/FPvo30O4gBcOOTEc= Received: from localhost (p54ad45cb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.69.203]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1610777451166709.1902724974738; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:10:51 -0800 (PST) References: <20210116041615.27cfa112@riseup.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: raingloom Subject: Re: bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented In-reply-to: <20210116041615.27cfa112@riseup.net> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87o8hpbee0.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: raingloom writes: > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system". > > * that is not a valid field of operating-system Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [136.143.188.55 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [136.143.188.55 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches everything in local email X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 45911 Cc: 45911@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) raingloom writes: > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system". > > * that is not a valid field of operating-system That=E2=80=99s right. It=E2=80=99s a field of guix-configuration, which is= documented in 10.8.1 Base Services. --=20 Ricardo