From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 03:23:56 2020 Received: (at 44805) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2020 08:23:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38302 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiCZI-0004gm-B0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:23:56 -0500 Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]:58336) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiCZG-0004gY-Bt for 44805@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:23:55 -0500 Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8997AFA0036 for <44805@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:23:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1606379028; s=s1; d=tutanota.com; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=PjmZ6hBTCT2PHgMYQk3RqjLqkgrcCdXf5rh0o6ANK80=; b=UD96TPAV/PizKjaXC6cstljcYDL16/h09jS440bXZSXwothWWiV+JFzXFAbacngb 34w7Ze6bmnksj1s1Ai5LnHJEPDhXkPCeqYgzURA2k57LzrYNVHLJR3EKoOk13eN8GFF K5dnNvPej1tF0gtEtUYYVQULCgKDGdkLztflVXY17SVPR8PbGhwkZahyTlC6UqB81v0 ZCbmZMFbKQUDdPfn/Jusq8sDKR3uZKbphRMdSAzhNnjwNDD2Dy/Maub6PdyzOs3I1Ag siYJPVL5F7gfQuLlbdmAl2a0m62R/71wULO2OtXaBS6YwgOXsC6yaiV1tlkHJ56d4EM LdXRVaFYOg== Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:23:48 +0100 (CET) From: musics@tutanota.com To: 44805 <44805@debbugs.gnu.org> Message-ID: Subject: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_274046_850451817.1606379028535" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Does the answer on the following page solve the problem? https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/621179/guix-system-problem-with-gnome-boxes Does the answer on the following page solve the problem? Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [81.3.6.162 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44805 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) ------=_Part_274046_850451817.1606379028535 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does the answer on the following page solve the problem? https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/621179/guix-system-problem-with-gnome-boxes ------=_Part_274046_850451817.1606379028535 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Does the answer on the following page solve the problem?


------=_Part_274046_850451817.1606379028535--