From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 26 16:36:20 2021 Received: (at 44662) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2021 20:36:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPtBs-0002B1-7K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:36:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:60482) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPtBq-0002Ak-3I for 44662@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:36:19 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F6Yf43CpnzDxt4 for <44662@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:36:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1616790972; bh=XUb17lBULlWbS1X2tnfQFWAFi2cFwgTyeGsbxbwiqbs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=djOz0AqmBjayiIQcaH3C9KiW4E2fFTg4xuQhRYDYMpEkGBOPR6h7z9CcrzWLPH5SH AdHTVkxH8gQyjiwjR/Q23fkPI5Vh97s6JLb+4lXAuQlzQ6YYIDMC7tAskHUz9djRW7 V5Hfe+ewdoiLFZs+nLcA3qE9mrFl6AQQK8lx89N4= X-Riseup-User-ID: C2F22758997F9A0E7231F886C0E2643C94B6D7D545DA95E6E1BBFEA110028BFA Received: from localhost (bc9cea23.catv.pool.telekom.hu [188.156.234.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F6Yf352vvz5vhN for <44662@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 21:29:49 +0100 From: raingloom To: 44662@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#44662: Lua search paths Message-ID: <20210326212949.5d954e44@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <86lfaa9sd8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20201115192441.0af831a5@riseup.net> <86lfaa9sd8.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44662 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:28:03 +0100 zimoun wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 19:24, raingloom wrote: > > I have a very WIP branch adding search paths to Lua. > > https://git.sr.ht/~raingloom/guix-source/tree/raingloom/lua > > > > The problem is that Lua uses a different path format compared to > > most packages. Instead of a list of directories, it is a list of > > path patterns, each potentially containing a question mark ('?'), > > which gets substituted for the module being searched. > > From my understanding, it is a duplicate to > <. Does it make sense to > merge them? > > > All the best, > simon Yup, a merge seems to be in order.