From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 10:41:25 2020 Received: (at 44077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2020 15:41:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48880 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj2Ll-0002Kj-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 10:41:25 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:54117) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj2Li-0002KS-OJ for 44077@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 10:41:24 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AD64C0005; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 15:41:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: Tanguy LE CARROUR Subject: Re: gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.4. References: <20201126133621.bnjr7g5p3rjndr2n@melmoth> <87mtz2tv49.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <1606572132.b3t9ih4lho.astroid@melmoth.none> Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 16:41:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1606572132.b3t9ih4lho.astroid@melmoth.none> (Tanguy LE CARROUR's message of "Sat, 28 Nov 2020 15:11:47 +0100") Message-ID: <874kl9trol.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 44077 Cc: 44077@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, Tanguy LE CARROUR writes: > Would have it been better for me to submit separate patches, as they are > not really specific to Poetry, and wait for them to be merged before > submitting a patch set with only `poetry-core` and `poetry`? The sole "problematic" patch is the one updating python-distlib, in the sense that it cannot be applied in the same branch as the others (unless everything goes into core-updates, of course). If you can split the set into independent parts, i.e., if you don't really need to update python-distlib prior to updating Poetry, we can process it differently. > The process is not yet clear to me. Out of sheer curiosity=E2=80=A6 can s= omeone object > to a merge in master? Who would that be? Per (info "(guix) Submitting Patches"), packages with more than 1800 dependent packages, as is the case with python-distlib, are updated in the "core-updates" branch. If I apply it on master branch, it will be reverted presto by another commiter. Does that make sense? Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou