From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 30 04:01:20 2021 Received: (at 43872) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2021 08:01:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58046 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKcEK-0000w1-Hg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 04:01:20 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com ([209.85.222.172]:33787) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKcEJ-0000vg-6f for 43872@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 04:01:19 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id b64so14827265qkg.0 for <43872@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:01:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=67ZN++5617begNBFvHv3bYAqOlBSyWpdbZ4q+l38VSo=; b=f6lBYnfkAXaqCEuUCgZgbPwc0aCfT/q4GRVav49cTbSFtnYeFSHjI/8TOV88d3L7Bz W2kbL9FJX2MDR/g/ltJMYsoggLGTzK8olRK9VOoldDO28MegFytUxtP90YzH7TcbZy4U XHCI4UaHPO7bLRVGJegYHRryJfdLGI0l1e+tj2Ka84rkbFRL9a+76pAIFu8wFU2thJ9M 6B+H3gzKIEGVQhmGL1mc6TY1RxcKk8gD2EMh3+XhcLqFl9jpZ6ZIYaN+5EqDKDztdXJj EnJ1HN5GL3oMp1ovuB87AIloKS/ipSKm6CCSZv2uWOd5U4BCS3BCO+B4sq8yVGopWURC Oo8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=67ZN++5617begNBFvHv3bYAqOlBSyWpdbZ4q+l38VSo=; b=ZrFZxkaND8jWKRGR1RREuDDaDH8AtiOrakm6zInwsI8GN/GF5IlPZxSMyjaFJhz9ik n99luvQGpOjnAuRo9jrEk7cj4jzvcOv1oJ47vP+ph/rS9XW/0rpDZgyPpE/uZK6bZv22 IcXYgUraBY7I6EWtNqSvaqmkW6oz5YgfhsBFaJ05KiHaS3HXWCkEkRAHKXhiTVUU9imu Jl4hmpX0OVL1Vhzd4pI2uXfezbw3OjhEu6/3wKqoSs/FJKgIK47ExFwnW0HA50fq8xtP POaSCRzEfrEL6jYzt8v37rzm8hEOmG9Cr2i11U4XSrKW0wQ58hvYnOPeXhIc9uwhv6oC cgcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531yow5EVYaHb/ty4R8NXNIuqDQhKJmz1e5HVa2lHOxlWwpxfACx k0yFFXhyHMZpsPP3UISWQM5aaOF8dbrrJRZ49QHH3lSzTqQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxz7KVHAndmzjYsPLkzTRaRX8wmEXtjXDkmFzjx/i7rQD031AHf0mic6woCfuyqhnsH00sDQionHbhEctEtSE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1aa7:: with SMTP id bl39mr22054795qkb.304.1630310473496; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:01:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <13xu_g-MkeM7DV1W1XsOjKTx_I1BGHYZNepHPM1gK6tBUMQNGNbnE3OaKQA0cLmTXLGGH0VgZa3HVE1_P4SSMVYWQdGvJB5xfRWkOqUBCmw=@lendvai.name> In-Reply-To: <13xu_g-MkeM7DV1W1XsOjKTx_I1BGHYZNepHPM1gK6tBUMQNGNbnE3OaKQA0cLmTXLGGH0VgZa3HVE1_P4SSMVYWQdGvJB5xfRWkOqUBCmw=@lendvai.name> From: zimoun Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:01:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#43872] (No Subject) To: Attila Lendvai Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Thanks for your interest. On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 at 18:43, Attila Lendvai wrote: Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.222.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.222.172 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43872 Cc: "43872@debbugs.gnu.org" <43872@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi, Thanks for your interest. On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 at 18:43, Attila Lendvai wrote: > i'm wondering what happened to the go-ethereum package. As Marius wrote when closing the patch submission: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- To properly package go-ethereum, you will need to declare each dependency as separate packages. See e.g. 'syncthing' for an example. Unfortunately there is no importer for Go yet, making it a rather tedious task. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > this issue is marked CLOSED, but i don't see go-ethereum anywhere in the repo, even though the go importer seems to have been merged. The issue is marked closed because it was an incorrect way to package it. The Go importer is indeed merged. Maybe, you could give a try via this way. > is there something i can do to help? shall i test this package on guix HEAD? or shall i just wait patiently? From my opinion, you would get more answers asking on the mailing guix-devel or on the IRC channel #guix than by unarchiving this "old" submission. :-) All the best, simon