Hi, zimoun skribis: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 17:56, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> What I meant to say was that, if we have other use cases, we can write >> new commands or extend existing ones to cater to those needs. That’s >> how ‘guix size’, etc. came to life. “Listing nodes” is not a use case >> per se, but rather an means to an end; let’s focus on the ends. :-) >> >> (Also, let’s avoid Unix arguments; the primary composition level in Guix >> is Scheme, not byte streams on stdout.) > > Well, I am not sure yet if I agree or disagree with you. :-) > I understand the arguments and I will not have time to write a v2 > which includes your suggestion; I am interested in listing the nodes > for some ends, not by visualizing the graph in a non-X environment. > Therefore, feel free to close this patch submission. OK so I’m closing for now, but let’s reopen an issue if you or someone else thinks we really need a list-node feature or something along these lines. Thanks, Ludo’.