From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 08:06:34 2020 Received: (at 43361) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2020 12:06:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49589 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHQm9-00047B-WC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:06:34 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:51310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHQm6-000470-9k for 43361@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:06:33 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D3E267C; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:06:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CUur2zXa9Ndq; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f::c4d]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63C6F1B6F; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:06:03 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: [bug#43361] [PATCH] doc: Mention config.scm in reconfigure description Message-ID: <20200913120603.GB2471@jurong> References: <20200912214852.42e4d123@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200912214852.42e4d123@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 09:48:52PM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote: > @item reconfigure > -Build the operating system described in @var{file}, activate it, and > -switch to it@footnote{This action (and t [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.9 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 RBL: Low reputation (-3) [185.233.100.1 listed in bl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blacklisted X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43361 Cc: 43361@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) Hello, On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 09:48:52PM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote: > @item reconfigure > -Build the operating system described in @var{file}, activate it, and > -switch to it@footnote{This action (and the related actions > -@code{switch-generation} and @code{roll-back}) are usable only on > -systems already running Guix System.}. > +Build the operating system described in @var{file} (typically > +@file{/etc/config.scm}), activate it, and switch to it@footnote{This action > +(and the related actions @code{switch-generation} and @code{roll-back}) are > +usable only on systems already running Guix System.}. to be honest, I find it less clear than before - it now almost sounds as if providing the file were optional, and that the command might search it as /etc/config.scm. Andreas