From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 08 12:24:42 2020 Received: (at 43274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2020 16:24:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56213 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgQE-0007HT-HK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:24:42 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:54590) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgQC-0007HL-Aw for 43274@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:24:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C62DA39; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:24:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92mz1OWyaR-E; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:24:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f::c08]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 866FFDA23; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:24:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:24:21 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: 43274@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#43274: fdisk fails to build on armhf Message-ID: <20200908162421.GA10312@jurong> References: <20200908111939.GA10965@jurong> <20200908120226.GA14984@jurong> <20200908131203.GA19681@jurong> <20200908154753.GA28320@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200908154753.GA28320@jurong> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 43274 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:47:53PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > The next step would be to check newer releases (12 and 13) of genimage. > Has it actually ever been built on the arm architecture? I tried 12 and 13, but already on x86_64 the test FAIL: test/basic-images.test 7 - mke2fs fails. If someone with more experience with the package could have a look, that would be nice. Andreas