Hi, Thanks for the feedback! Attaching the updated patch. Thanks, Alex On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 23:06 -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hello, > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > > Hi Alexandros, > > > > Alexandros Theodotou skribis: > > > > > This is actually 2 patches. The first updates libcyaml and the > > > 2nd > > > Zrythm. Note that I (Zrythm author) have added a trademark policy > > > to > > > Zrythm that says modified versions that include the trademarks > > > require > > > permission (as discussed on IRC with a few people): > > > https://www.zrythm.org/en/trademarks.html > > > > > > I am not 100% sure if patching the xdg-open path counts as a > > > modified > > > version, but in any case this email is signed using the same key > > > used > > > to sign the release, so it can be interpreted as "written > > > permission" > > > to redistribute this. > > > > OK. Perhaps right above the ‘name’ field of the package, you could > > add > > a link to the trademark policy above and state that Guix has a > > written > > permission to use it, with a link to your message? That way we’ll > > have > > an audit trail. > > That's a good idea. > > > > The FSDG allows trademarks from what I understand: > > > > Your interpretation seems correct to me. > > To me as well. > > > > So it is up to the maintainers to decide if they want to keep > > > Zrythm as > > > it is or rename it. Either way, I am happy with either decision, > > > although I would prefer if you were OK with keeping the "Zrythm" > > > name > > > (as long as there's no patches to remove/add functionality or > > > links to > > > the Zrythm website or things like that). > > > > I don’t see any reason not to keep “Zrythm” as things stand. > > > > Thoughts anyone? (Cc: maintainers.) > > I wish the trademark restrictions were relaxed to include the right > for > modifications made solely with the goal of > building/packaging/integrating the software with a free software > distribution. This would make things hassle free and extra clear. > > That said, I'm not opposed to include Zrythm as things stands, if > other > maintainers are OK with it. > > Maxim