From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 23 11:03:56 2021 Received: (at 42338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2021 15:03:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42338 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIBUR-0000GL-Id for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:03:56 -0400 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.161]:49676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mI6Xg-0006Wi-AT for 42338@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 05:46:56 -0400 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GtS7Y74y6zQkDy for <42338@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:46:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=minikn.xyz; s=MBO0001; t=1629712008; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=0oxWSM4egfLljKHHT1kF03r6plwJjvskoDCLGxG1YqU=; b=IYt8QMNVy0jIqpDyDFoCTmEWNO9BjFr735UW7fhAGM17741hoXKzp0TJOMbugdtM+GtWHo ztQ77QgPSf25138MEP0IAjtLGEzQZaLVW5C3kManzU9u3kPKywPYKqIC/6qo4Fc3PQnXy5 sUAycClpabduDgb9M30qtrLCLxLQK9h7iZ2TqKICGIIN2FRyS/7Qfl859vSWgGd+6Id6fB F5JsD0qwuA4FLYX2yC7tGlkJhUE4qAobnTKjtK/5iIBueoDXl06J5A2WnsGskod32QSRhK G/l+cTKuyuucZ9jd0VoKZUG1ykGQSoHh9As2iEqnbcv5c8kHHV05DYogJT0+wg== Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.116]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id 9N0DlrEV621y for <42338@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:46:46 +0200 (CEST) From: To: <42338@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:46:49 +0200 Message-ID: <000a01d79803$cbd95220$638bf660$@minikn.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01D79814.8F622220" Thread-Index: AdeYA8trxgTP5XssSWOrgikG2z4hmA== Content-Language: de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CCF9318B4 X-Rspamd-UID: cfc76e X-Spam-Score: 4.3 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. Is this feature still being worked on? I'd love to make use of it! Cheers, Demis. Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: minikn.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [80.241.56.161 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.241.56.161 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42338 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:03:54 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello. Is this feature still being worked on? I'd love to make use of it! Cheers, Demis. Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: minikn.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.241.56.161 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [80.241.56.161 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01D79814.8F622220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello. Is this feature still being worked on? I'd love to make use of it! Cheers, Demis. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01D79814.8F622220 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello. Is = this feature still being worked on? I’d love to make use of = it!

Cheers,

Demis.

------=_NextPart_000_000B_01D79814.8F622220--