From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 03 09:26:44 2020 Received: (at 42162) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2020 14:26:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43934 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZxGm-0007on-6R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 09:26:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58276) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZxGk-0007oY-5o for 42162@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 09:26:42 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZxGd-0003iZ-Nr; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 09:26:36 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=59474 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kZxGb-0003Co-Lj; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 09:26:34 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Timothy Sample Subject: Re: bug#42162: Recovering source tarballs References: <87mu4iv0gc.fsf@inria.fr> <86h7uq8fmk.fsf@gmail.com> <87d05etero.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1tit5j6.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <875za4ykej.fsf@ngyro.com> <87bljvu4p4.fsf@gnu.org> <87d047u0l3.fsf@ngyro.com> <87wo2dnhgb.fsf@gnu.org> <874kpgudic.fsf@ngyro.com> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 15:26:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874kpgudic.fsf@ngyro.com> (Timothy Sample's message of "Wed, 05 Aug 2020 14:57:31 -0400") Message-ID: <87pn4ucy94.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42162 Cc: 42162@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Timothy, I hope you=E2=80=99re well. I was wondering if you=E2=80=99ve had the chan= ce to fiddle with Disarchive since the summer? I=E2=80=99m thinking there are small steps we could take to move forward: 1. Have a Disarchive package in Guix (and one for guile-quickcheck, kudos on that one!). 2. Have a Cuirass job running on ci.guix.gnu.org to build and publish the disarchive-db. 3. Integrate Disarchive in (guix download) to reconstruct tarballs. WDYT? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99, who=E2=80=99s still very much excited about these perspectiv= es!