From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 11 12:29:00 2020 Received: (at 41798) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2020 16:29:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37885 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jjQ4a-00017x-0K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:29:00 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:47391) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jjQ4X-00017k-Nw for 41798@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:28:58 -0400 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1315-147.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.129.147]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02955240002; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:28:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Arun Isaac , 41798@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#41798] [PATCH] gnu: xf86-input-libinput: Reduce closure size. In-Reply-To: References: <20200611071402.29056-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:28:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87imfx36t9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Arun Isaac writes: > `guix refresh -l` reports that this change will cause the rebuild of 781 > packages. So, according to the manual, this should go to the staging > branch. Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: systemreboot.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.178.230 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.178.230 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41798 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Arun Isaac writes: > `guix refresh -l` reports that this change will cause the rebuild of 781 > packages. So, according to the manual, this should go to the staging > branch. Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: systemreboot.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.178.230 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.178.230 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Arun Isaac writes: > `guix refresh -l` reports that this change will cause the rebuild of 781 > packages. So, according to the manual, this should go to the staging > branch. Weird, I get this: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > guix refresh -l xf86-input-libinput Building the following 2 packages would ensure 4 dependent packages are reb= uilt: lxqt@0.14.1 xfce@4.14.2 =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- In fact, to test the patch Guix didn't rebuild anything for me (I don't use lxqt / xfce). =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl7iW8IACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9n4wf8CIYd610ulqnXWO4oAuoYvSl3x7IDfVilQ/7fh98PS1nK59LBdv7DbHc3 k5J+3WuHEtUTDyNacEQ+2mrYlm7s0y6bbYuCOan2RtUAhXRdjCLYJ379TdEm140X cXKRT0dqWvGiq8ATidgzcPikTIcHRxOcxXfkaiHuztoZ60WvqFc2frbxKwZeMcC7 IwTdd1W6Mif9CWz/q/rGpi2dM4cqpi1So3IZPuW3iNcp9F5gq9l+MUTDao0nWXr6 6fpCGVAL8K3ExXdclTvvWc2ZC9XiRAHNKfskyffjY4Sdv22QIWNXOla1X0E1ZqkO 9b3FL285OTzY+R2xb+MrxrobCRhiOA== =icJF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--