Mathieu Othacehe writes: >> (define (hurd-multiboot-modules os) >> ... >> (libc (if target >> (with-parameters ((%current-target-system #f)) >> ;; TODO: cross-libc has extra patches for the Hurd; >> ;; remove in next rebuild cycle >> (cross-libc target)) >> glibc)) >> >> we take the ELSE branch here -- and that does not work. AIUI, this is >> really a temporary kludge until the next rebuild cycle we can move some >> hurd-specific glibc patches from cross-libc to glibc-proper. > > Oh, I know why! In "system-image", there are a few calls, in the first > let, that are outside the "with-parameters", in particular "bootcfg" > which triggers the problem you are describing above. Ah, yes that makes sense. > Maybe something as naive as: > > diff --git a/gnu/system/image.scm b/gnu/system/image.scm [..] > - (let* ((os (operating-system-for-image image)) [..] > - (with-parameters ((%current-target-system target)) > + (with-parameters ((%current-target-system target)) > + (let* ((os (operating-system-for-image image)) > > would do the trick. It does! > I went ahead and pushed a variant of this as > c9f6e2e5bdff186583bdc360832b57f4c56e3427. Woohoo! I remove the with-parameters in hurd-vm-disk-image and pushed to master 5e9cf93364d87c70f8bfad915417cd75d21c0fed Greetings, Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ® http://AvatarAcademy.com