From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 05 04:36:19 2020 Received: (at 41575) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2020 08:36:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47862 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kPLyl-0000lV-1o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 04:36:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kPLyj-0000lG-Cv; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 04:36:17 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kPLya-0000W4-O1; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 04:36:11 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=34204 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kPLyZ-0004LY-3U; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 04:36:08 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Edouard Klein Subject: Re: [bug#43371] [PATCH] doc: prevent host/container nscd mismatch References: <87lfhet1d2.fsf@rdklein.fr> <87y2ld9ym2.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuw0ddn3.fsf@rdklein.fr> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:36:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tuw0ddn3.fsf@rdklein.fr> (Edouard Klein's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:24:32 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7r93w96.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41575 Cc: 41575@debbugs.gnu.org, 43371-done@debbugs.gnu.org, conjaroy X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Edouard Klein skribis: >> Actually, perhaps the better fix is to never use the host=E2=80=99s nscd= ? We >> could change =E2=80=98containerized-operating-system=E2=80=99 accordingl= y. >> > > I think this would be best, but I did not know where to make this > change, so I just edited the doc instead. I don't know if containers > need the host's nscd to avoid the libc issues mentionned in the doc, but > if they dont, then prevening them from accessing the host's nscd seems > logical and would solve the problem. And we wouldn't need to amend the > doc at all. This has now been done by Jason in 5627bfe45ce46f498979b4ad2deab1fdfed22b6c. Closing! Ludo=E2=80=99.