From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 25 05:31:48 2020 Received: (at 41455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2020 09:31:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jd9SW-0006VD-8A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 05:31:48 -0400 Received: from sender4-op-o11.zoho.com ([136.143.188.11]:17131) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jd9SU-0006V3-Tw for 41455@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 05:31:47 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590399104; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=jUqDIpNpXd+Bc0lst73vC93pKKQG+Ejl/cPyMl48i44mO+dkJZLMlllYLGn2ES3eGhCvF4LXxO1rsHif9D6XIbLxffG5pFDaYuqougcZVvh5ZRD8BLZ+f7XC7JQ+YIwig1yOifbpZpkXDMHitG4v+OWvFIENk9+gsoUE0g6Z7J8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1590399104; h=Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=UE6KU2B4jjwYpWh2XUW3ETJuMpSA08wR24aq8JoCm5w=; b=KWiqIahMUqmOW5sRB53ZfMsRezgD0bXjtv9QrXUProQCdcHKMBsuR/k+VQHP8KfkpyTVHT8nGFxy1C5uEqIl94gxDV39zX0gek/aGni3RrNF5KvkIG/hHfCViFsuzKOwwXuuWRbCNvOl3Q4KMlDIX1+EhKA0oBhSXSfLwlWbaCY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=beaver-labs.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=edk@beaver-labs.com; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1590399104; s=zoho; d=beaver-labs.com; i=edk@beaver-labs.com; h=References:From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=UE6KU2B4jjwYpWh2XUW3ETJuMpSA08wR24aq8JoCm5w=; b=ju2LQ918phvZAFH+Agqq0IdqgRsDf1sjZYJ8EDZPvIRx7EjfLxxOdwa7wR/4wy/C +dKqaEREuqJu8HnHXe4g8RGEnIYPEitpOQgUnpi4+nIJbiBJaWT53B11p17Sxf4oFnQ ZraaeukRJ9DwvyAbE2msBhCcxTxUeA3RqbSUsgO0= Received: from alice.lan (lfbn-idf1-1-1299-119.w90-79.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.79.23.119]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1590399100371637.1847870430613; Mon, 25 May 2020 02:31:40 -0700 (PDT) References: <87d06wazez.fsf@alice.lan> <87r1va7an9.fsf@devup.no> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.6; emacs 26.3 From: Edouard Klein To: 41455@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#41455] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-daemux In-reply-to: <87r1va7an9.fsf@devup.no> Message-ID: <871rn8jr7y.fsf@alice.lan> Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 11:31:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41455 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi ! Thank you for reviewing the patches. Marius Bakke writes: > Edouard Klein writes: > >> * /gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm (python-daemux): New variable > > Thanks! The package LGTM but already does not apply because other > packages have been appended to python-xyz.scm. To reduce change of > merge conflicts, I recommend adding packages somewhere "in the > middle". Thanks for the tip :) > > However, I wonder if this and python-libtmux are better suited in > tmux.scm. WDYT? I have no strong feelings one way or the other, but I slightly lean on the side of tmux.scm. I'll send two patches for python-libtmux and python-daemux from the current master, in tmux.scm. > > In any case can you rebase this patch? Thanks in advance!