From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 19 06:34:42 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2020 10:34:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49333 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaza6-0002Oy-JR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:34:42 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55518) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaza5-0002Op-BC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:34:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaza5-0003lN-4O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:34:41 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaza2-0003Vl-BI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:34:40 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589884472; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=KtbI3OiyCPWPbFYMPkJhkbl6KwV4fGIswXTFyhWibHcGc/64CJ6LIjc8UJLtF49T2WW6ZMU5XRizLlencVmTOoqoYBoBNhUJbn4WrgR1Bmn/V4vktvEKNluSgBEHRNCpWk1C4eX6LiCjiEmHRxSvh/wL9i3Po/zgqlN6pUniGak= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1589884472; h=Content-Type:Date:From:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To; bh=QqgWpQlOj7WTko2dQykNSerXxreQfzYh93jWWJdwxK4=; b=W+NF1/uHT+sFAUERQQCDP0H7d4UBu+KJifH2UbP/9pRobj8GQqt08Y6avVoG0dV2OS5ttk5MDfoDdtoLylDvvGHBnp0V2HbC1m01hmwnq+h/7ZdkpxxhFkDEnNcK1dJWYaVIU4CXEpFI5+2cX+AAtN2CzefrxwPvXKlc48pE5js= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1589884472; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=QqgWpQlOj7WTko2dQykNSerXxreQfzYh93jWWJdwxK4=; b=JHYvQtD8ENdLzh/oYrZB24SKfclry7k71flmBLDZd2UOwbPiH2zwhV31cVpvtB/X y9XXfBfu5g92gCvDbmr6E8s/Sm+dsYCRoqy0ogRWa2x8BZZUSjddbY1w76zKSwX7zT1 l1+0+0vPoB36mhY8rc6T2og92E0gvry4syV7S2XU= Received: from localhost (p54ad4b96.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.75.150]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1589884470877644.3581152984718; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:34:30 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.4.4; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: java-kafka-clients fails tests X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 12:34:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9ksfc24.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.53; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o53.zoho.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/19 06:34:34 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) java-kafka-clients has a failing test: [junit] Running org.apache.kafka.common.network.SslTransportLayerTest [junit] SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder". [junit] SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation [junit] SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further details. [junit] Tests run: 31, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 8.072 sec The SLF4J failure seems to be unrelated (other tests also have this warning). -- Ricardo