From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 08 16:09:41 2020 Received: (at 41162) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2020 21:09:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59977 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmkEu-0001BZ-PU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:09:41 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:44519) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmkEq-0001BF-04 for 41162@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:09:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1607461769; bh=gbfu/cEGugCBeE/ff73IqBb5ncRHs8a07/4hyozgFjc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=OuGzqxBkQost59ACp3kbUDdTFjjUBz8cIY9S9FmGcAo5gFprlLGr5z0Zmh6nHcs7c Ahy0VeadX3JibKGQeOEKbYYs6WsgLK8WDUBuZQ/xtjMO01JagivRPt5Otr0b3dXb0f 6Rmdbxv+1itajHSVL39BTwnysgELh0OBL7uL/mJM= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from [192.168.178.74] ([88.152.184.82]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb005 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MJFhX-1kS2aY0zcZ-00KPuI; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 22:09:29 +0100 Subject: Re: [bug#41162] [PATCH 0/2] [core-updates] Update atril. To: Christopher Baines References: <20200509210914.24829-1-jonathan.brielmaier@web.de> <87y2i8ghyh.fsf@cbaines.net> From: Jonathan Brielmaier Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 22:09:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87y2i8ghyh.fsf@cbaines.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:TLJtNR6chRPHhrh/0HxpygCyEc757vgSV1hbNO6wpy/AjevKwP3 LwupzJHFjOyGnO1w/VvzmjMCCkgl+NYonbstEZA6Y6h/LdBb52rGATlFwI0k45qHct46zCa YsqFFwzb7Y0yB7s5jg0675rbrgrcAftFKI7CA/j2o/fWtrBTR5X7JQUbvd1rYcauGf78Ruf cDR2VxuB15hOz0rVZ7Vew== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:wjxSIYsCmls=:7x6AdkWpLvc4dY0ypq/fAz lTjiD81aellupFLakGHyIzUEObfzjfhmsK5JFZ1iJfoa7gJxjO4pgEb4PuLCq6dGDkovXwL0j sUJpBbShpmK0rg0WPmRavkb1Er/n+yMtOti7ZSOm5A2I/k9rWkeUqcnrLKfqxyAb5EhubBO6j OqFJT4rsDA9IxWdhzPbzZrLJwkCmAS+mAeyBtOtQMP8lD7DKk5Ljsf7Mmb6oHKtcaw+1cfmaE ldLV3wt1MJbj11MgnXr2BuvW7x2h2GjhyeAq6qMhtFLaiF0OU+ePJQ/aNkoz4CDhu3C+6aQL9 jASj+997fjxdB241TcZBPRfrF+odngnFRymt7IPfJiKNYsYopizS5Nmaidd45dbuaSK9ioGD8 8VDVYvgcxzXbi25s4s7uWxTlPO3/PP1sjO73jZ4XZDkw97EfxqOTc/ADswg9yfMv+CtFIgP0/ rB1J2N56ohOsogSQVnNMVS4u50nOQP0FO5o0rq2YBI04Qg27uiaE8r3LNuPr+4aYcn/9GVxjW lK1MgjgnFRN3LQZ6gmLSKtVl2PdE/rmpp2r3dSxF+H3Dhi1vPD4NOIIertOd6PGctJu+nCfWG FXji7XzPlco+4hRwXN3xPCnMxeZE8w/xaThBPD7HxWaWylHXO37872K4RX5FoMu8Gaj2U2JHW 383SehPtGwf7Fe/f0ulHiD/cXjszyUafC6Di6ViMwQJBG+j+d54BH5b4Y9pJK+ggqeEsUC8Ia 4HSp0FlNAzKKu4tt6eqSsWwCHCEbBhOMiEVR44bZ7wRVLl3xHNRX1eZSjg12p7Fm7if2rDs4A wrPwlLgVAwcY0k/OkAiwNe8pRHaX7bWRXDTY8j7dfyMItYJb20hhUsP5RyUqax1oAv65YyxjE MLCFC30KpprNEalfFYZbZWTZBW+VVmj/SaNWROD+UapbF19cbdiamn03Y3ZXSt X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 08.12.20 21:29, Christopher Baines wrote: > This looks good to me! So I can just push this now to core-updates now, I guess? Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jonathan.brielmaier[at]web.de) 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [88.152.184.82 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.14 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.14 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41162 Cc: 41162@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 08.12.20 21:29, Christopher Baines wrote: > This looks good to me! So I can just push this now to core-updates now, I guess? Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.14 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [88.152.184.82 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.14 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jonathan.brielmaier[at]web.de) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) On 08.12.20 21:29, Christopher Baines wrote: > This looks good to me! So I can just push this now to core-updates now, I guess?