From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 19 14:17:50 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2020 18:17:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50903 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jb6oI-0001r7-EL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:17:50 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:36433) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jb6o9-0001qd-Kz; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:17:45 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2E15C01A3; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:17:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 May 2020 14:17:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh= M43psECVaQ3VPUWAS1tTc2CREvAFwAKpvoLafV1LSt4=; b=Hi2gcZUO6IxHU23O 0c1LKOYwZB5vpPx6/fqoI6tY77tciEMXpKTLPDHQwUyosscOTcTB69istuErT/cN tTl2bd2ePbvQlqiRsYZYf5VbC33Bhb1TPTuKnuqcystY2Fjx6fvYK05dW6VhuLDD P0qMvbofs57XSjjc1p586uZ9vKLSNkZcrACXeyi5+NAwk8H0R1HypGw4k8srd0Ma halgETh0prmvZYkdkVzSwYyKW5daz1nlBKTeNzelgGSQoOJiDTFJoN9Rx5oXLdDl wPOj43KXmuGYJUtjPFTBXOng0O26c84ZSVRem7PCXCmaho4xhM36pmhEiAex+4di oI68iA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=M43psECVaQ3VPUWAS1tTc2CREvAFwAKpvoLafV1LS t4=; b=gb4XglFxtWF+FO1ycwiIMPpGzs8TAdxVpmFg/hVhbq7UXcrpIEhjgH/aJ 5nNBQfA0kdPIMle0S0IoXTJn6UwosRjkXkJ8n/0PA9N08w+dnot78+0kBQkluAaS D5/lq5ENu0IKkpcfDNKVXoOZ7+frcRiNDoLg6bNScAcrkcfGy1npTDSrxJ/w8Wps EdVZHXnv3k1QxFY++fyy0tPhz/qSztIEJMY2SadMAD19lfxeykj+24UpuROtjaqQ mVpR5FTkr705ZrU7LbYZRPmlriRUa1cdyK41+6YTLFlQLvRpkY7bUZOeTQVnhm4d IzoPxophg5i9M5GlHyB5CANTA4ZdA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddtjedguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfggtgfgsehtqh ertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrihhushcuuegrkhhkvgcuoehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgr shhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiffduvddvjefggfdtuddvue elteefheefhfdtieeihfelheehtdeihffhkeekveenucffohhmrghinheptghomhhmohhn rdhnvghtfihorhhkpdhslhhfgehjrdhorhhgpdhgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppeekvddrud egkedrudeluddrudeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghi lhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ip82-148-191-18.breiband.no [82.148.191.18]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A65ED3280063; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:17:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Ricardo Wurmus , 41396@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#41396: java-kafka-clients fails tests In-Reply-To: <87v9ksfc24.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87v9ksfc24.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 20:17:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnazrdqa.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) merge 41396 40718 thanks Ricardo Wurmus writes: > java-kafka-clients has a failing test: > > [junit] Running org.apache.kafka.common.network.SslTransportLayerTest > [junit] SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinde= r". > [junit] SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation > [junit] SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder= for further details. > [junit] Tests run: 31, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elaps= ed: 8.072 sec > > The SLF4J failure seems to be unrelated (other tests also have this warni= ng). It only seems to happen on big-memory systems (but consistently so). Bj=C3=B6rn did some investigation here: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/40718#2 If you can reproduce it, please help! :-)