From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 30 11:41:56 2020 Received: (at 40662) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2020 15:41:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47505 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUBJz-0007PV-QG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:41:55 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:57430 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUBJx-0007PM-EC for 40662@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:41:54 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E028336055C; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:41:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1588261312; bh=EcGgZJVxVXL4R3odoH67YDaMLufEUqMiQR8B6U7FLsM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=OjTusUcxJcKXdaEOShZtJXDtAZEzj6yK8CamR6eDoYyWQZG/ZH93pJBYPL0gUnVMf 9eSuxBG7w+PnyRIRFuY1orBkhmtNsautbNhFAQsoPu6H3hJ2amQdfckHvxptFQ/TYm sd6c0x4vCdBogrxFn8nr6dNRl7lgIo3iE+WHa4is= Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:41:50 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: [bug#40662] [PATCH 0/2] Add efivarfs support. Message-ID: <20200430154150.eogbhn6crje4tho6@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20200416150436.3274-1-m.othacehe@gmail.com> <20200430124618.r4yck2mmenup6p5n@pelzflorian.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200430124618.r4yck2mmenup6p5n@pelzflorian.localdomain> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40662 Cc: 40662@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 02:46:18PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 05:04:36PM +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > Here's a small serie to add support for efivarfs and fix the issue reported > > here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2020-04/msg00274.html. > Well I had no issues with efivars on install without your patch. I > will try to provoke the error by adding more efivars. I did not yet > manage to create a new efivar via dd or via the efivar program though. Actually I see no reason to test after provoking Keyhenge’s error. How does your patch fix a full NVRAM? I thought Keyhenge resolved their error by deleting “files” from the full NVRAM. Do I misunderstand Keyhenge’s issue? But /sys/firmware/efi/efivars probably should be mounted anyway. Do you know why efivarfs on /sys/firmware/efi/efivars type efivarfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) is mounted even without your patch once I add %desktop-services to my config.scm? Regards, Florian