From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 21 12:22:33 2022 Received: (at 40558) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2022 17:22:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34997 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAxcP-0004N9-1H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:22:33 -0500 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAxcM-0004N1-VD for 40558@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:22:32 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1642785748; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=VcAXzFaSWyK8M4TNHs17JrkBgTMBiwHtZ6mTMjsLppvtZs62fMhRn2JvXzTY5+tQr27ajlbj8AKkb92Yp3it9HUTrr1PkZVZVFOevqEaJ6xiRq5dszqTyX7qJi9nQZpB+4z3s2t5n5ABC9MZyIgw7THYAs0kkRl6YRbmDj6Orsg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1642785748; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=BJjLm52HM37B4WX2GMHSSt2Y26CEUTYRcJ62hlQOObw=; b=eEDG810D2oWQ8hojzHqu/sFjo8z7q35WkQ056uU+vt+MYlGVfxFpP3y7qV9xQ6Wtu/KE1Kq/xIDjcpEy8PFtShAZFjvrEQP0Lrhr2M1ZgkKC2cN/vkaVR9ptOyDMUo6bphgcMNfFEGXpIH228mnSCi3gafbN3Sr8TQ4w+PevhoQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1642785748; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=BJjLm52HM37B4WX2GMHSSt2Y26CEUTYRcJ62hlQOObw=; b=ALqxKaPRPNq3yW9GQLOyVJvX8yu2hufMJsnLq/saHDBGcOt9Vc4xTF4VYX+Bqx4z +LCLrGkRWmGw8w8/dBnVRGGdhX+b6A9Da7DGtahho5cdCAmD0n2jGptrC5WDhwAAH3k bU3D6M2eRwnnjwFvwUSs8nzDl5gShDT+O+X8UgK4= Received: from localhost (p54ad4dca.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.77.202]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1642785746324516.5505239626732; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:22:26 -0800 (PST) References: <874ktqxalv.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <27M6ZG86RAW9I.2JWF3V3MICGED@wilsonb.com> <8736203agz.fsf@elephly.net> <2O0C65TN1X0RC.2X8CEIYC1SBBG@wilsonb.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.2 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: elaexuotee@wilsonb.com Subject: Re: bug#40558: Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 18:21:11 +0100 In-reply-to: <2O0C65TN1X0RC.2X8CEIYC1SBBG@wilsonb.com> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Message-ID: <87sfthovg2.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40558 Cc: 40558@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) elaexuotee@wilsonb.com writes: > Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> This is a problem with the modular TeX Live packages. The pk files are >> bitmap fonts. I found that adding texlive-cm-super to the union helps >> in that the bitmap variants of the CM fonts will not be generated any >> more. More font packages may be needed in the union to prevent TeX from >> falling back to bitmap fonts in other cases. >>=20 >> In any case, that=E2=80=99s unrelated to Jelle=E2=80=99s patch, which lo= oks fine to me. > > Thank you, Ricardo, for looking into this. > > I have lost signficant amounts of hair trying to find a solution. Adding > texlive-cm-super doesn't help for the document I trying to typeset. In fa= ct, I > even grabbed all texlive packages with fonts and threw them in the > texlive-union to no effect. No matter what, pdflatex bails when trying to= find > the font to set $~$. > > The only way I have gotten it to typeset under a texlive-union so far is = by > munging texlive-amsfonts as Jelle mentioned. I have since added texlive-amsfonts/fixed, which installs all the files it is supposed to (according do the tlpdb). I=E2=80=99ve also since fixed = font search. Can this issue be closed? --=20 Ricardo