From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 26 18:08:24 2020 Received: (at 40558) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2020 22:08:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXAfA-0007wU-HC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:08:24 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXAf7-0007wG-RX for 40558@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:08:22 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603750099; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=Omhp2uG0UQT4Pswd7S0w/hCueQnydqMXfwMVDatQ+YFWbHuj5FCMb15JFJ5BltevpYs73RL9AnMoOLMLve0QQoAq+Au9DNmr+00GpEjUK2TvmqDW9qbq0gV/NeAxKcX0xwNjO9N3xKqri9H0TIZCiOuIzctMaYxYwAY6FHnH/XA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1603750099; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=7/+G5JZML9t9XjPQ9no4jp1OIv+wiPj55Vjok+0d+ZI=; b=goFS2LL8VVGpKh6t8geek3xH2uHd9TsKWwsZCz4hRG3m2kuORx+3MQIQczweHVfD30dTRKVCEMjvPUX/2VpOGqywdkrKoCxmb4pLkN1EkP/9Mq2GkNU9daxKEreWAhn/IxMILoagY0JFpy3T7tHYZ/NNavn9SsgylULOQKUF5io= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1603750099; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=7/+G5JZML9t9XjPQ9no4jp1OIv+wiPj55Vjok+0d+ZI=; b=XoIwou+o9QCR4oG7ipgKeNNixZFNFdMR6v9+mJbmVUTKI+4yNQeDgE/dsTgBqgav P+vPJUCPnSTaZ9JzviOgfQ9wbR+9XnCRnEmXu1dgwwANmAy93OLGZA189jDpRw7dMZX s+p4t+ma8wgrUwKohIL/iXUW43defkCc2OKvmdSY= Received: from localhost (p54ad4c4a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.76.74]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1603750095669107.58785442043177; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:08:15 -0700 (PDT) References: <874ktqxalv.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <27M6ZG86RAW9I.2JWF3V3MICGED@wilsonb.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: elaexuotee@wilsonb.com Subject: Re: bug#40558: (no subject) In-reply-to: <27M6ZG86RAW9I.2JWF3V3MICGED@wilsonb.com> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:10:04 +0100 Message-ID: <8736203agz.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: elaexuotee@wilsonb.com writes: > With the patch to texlive-amsfonts the above typesets just fine; > however, metafont ends up generating cmmi10.657pk and cmr10.657pk font > files. Is this expected? Typsetting it from the texlive in [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [136.143.188.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [136.143.188.51 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40558 Cc: 40558@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) elaexuotee@wilsonb.com writes: > With the patch to texlive-amsfonts the above typesets just fine; > however, metafont ends up generating cmmi10.657pk and cmr10.657pk font > files. Is this expected? Typsetting it from the texlive installation > of my foreign distro doesn't call out to metafont at all. This is a problem with the modular TeX Live packages. The pk files are bitmap fonts. I found that adding texlive-cm-super to the union helps in that the bitmap variants of the CM fonts will not be generated any more. More font packages may be needed in the union to prevent TeX from falling back to bitmap fonts in other cases. In any case, that=E2=80=99s unrelated to Jelle=E2=80=99s patch, which looks= fine to me. --=20 Ricardo