From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 08 10:30:41 2020 Received: (at 40492) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2020 14:30:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46028 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jX41R-0003F1-5u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 10:30:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46152) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jX41G-0003Eb-II for 40492@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 10:30:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX41B-0003si-1o; Fri, 08 May 2020 10:30:25 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=38628 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jX417-0007dB-Pf; Fri, 08 May 2020 10:30:22 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ekaitz Zarraga Subject: Re: [bug#40492] [PATCH] gnu: Add meshlab In-Reply-To: (Ekaitz Zarraga's message of "Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:00:09 +0000") References: <_UXapokzwPRYl41j0bjkPGSDUNXahWNWsEn72py7ch7Rd6DBsxW9B8rw8wTbmzj1O2HfWXz7XLbEdWCYQsFCa5DgMlGn0CKVPr779J2PFuo=@elenq.tech> <87a733v3hh.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo67ti07.fsf@gnu.org> <87blneynu0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 16:30:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7wqcxdv.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40492 Cc: "40492@debbugs.gnu.org" <40492@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Saluton, Did you have a change to look into this? Thanks, Ludo'. Ekaitz Zarraga skribis: > On Sunday, April 26, 2020 10:49 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s w= rote: > >> Saluton! >> >> Ekaitz Zarraga ekaitz@elenq.tech skribis: >> >> > From 814e44cb90b1427a9af5d6a66392c5a39910e8fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > From: Ekaitz Zarraga ekaitz@elenq.tech >> > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:56:06 +0200 >> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add meshlab. >> > >> > * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (meshlab): New variable. >> > >> >> Great! I added a copyright line for you, fixed up indentation (see the >> bit in the manual for how to do that automatically), and added a >> comment=E2=80=94patch attached. >> >> It built for me, but then I realized I had missed something: the >> external/ sub-directory contains lots of bundled copies of external >> tools, and indeed, the =E2=80=98configure=E2=80=99 phase shows: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> -- Could NOT find Lib3ds (missing: LIB3DS_INCLUDE_DIR LIB3DS_LIBRARY) >> -- Could NOT find GMP (missing: GMP_INCLUDE_DIR GMP_LIBRARY) >> -- Could NOT find muparser (missing: MUPARSER_INCLUDE_DIR MUPARSER_LIBRA= RY) >> -- Could NOT find OpenCTM (missing: OPENCTM_INCLUDE_DIR OPENCTM_LIBRARY) >> -- Could NOT find Qhull (missing: QHULL_qhull_LIBRARY QHULL_qhull_INCLUD= E_DIR qhull) >> -- Found OpenMP_C: -fopenmp (found version "4.5") >> -- Found OpenMP_CXX: -fopenmp (found version "4.5") >> -- Found OpenMP: TRUE (found version "4.5") >> -- - jhead - using bundled source >> -- - glew - using bundled source >> -- - Eigen - using bundled source >> -- - newuoa - using bundled source >> -- - levmar - using bundled source >> -- - lib3ds - using bundled source >> -- - muparser - using bundled source >> -- - OpenCTM - using bundled source >> -- - structure-synth - using bundled source >> -- - qhull - using bundled source >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> Some of these are already packaged, so it should be a matter of adding >> them to =E2=80=98inputs=E2=80=99. For the remaining ones, it would be ex= tra packaging >> work to do. >> >> The goal is to address all of these, but if we can address the majority >> of these, perhaps we can commit a first version of the package with a >> FIXME stating what remains to be done, if you prefer. >> >> Thanks, and apologies for overlooking it before! >> >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Hi, > > No worries, I'll try to take a look to those. > > We can push it with the Fixme and I'll go adding those during these days = when I'm free. > > Thanks! > > PS: Should I push those to the same file under engineering? or should I c= reate a new file for meshlab and add all its dependencies there too?