From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 20 18:32:37 2020 Received: (at 40079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2020 22:32:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45777 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jFQBx-0006Et-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:32:37 -0400 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:57181) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jFQBv-0006Eb-1V for 40079@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:32:35 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E8C5FF; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:32:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:32:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=+h1l1iDG5Ml5DOimj/ZFW17QGP mkUIulrLPN3CkRfqk=; b=fJaZ57uo2nRF5Z1qqaMNfCmUkjHBBfchzRN4kWO7Kz OqYuH5/15r848tF7B0wRBRiMKdd1ITObhjrB2g35C+LA/lUrPVV0g1jzBwHIKlbK 1f9AjDB2HEjhwGip9qVCiCRLpDHzFOOBb9ohlDqYgFNML30QDDdhQyN2bxEx/6eX l487lvwB3JTPwAc0n77MAmilR7Kh42AeWQJxmgI6jIYMd2z26ujqw4yrNHELrs2L d25Cpnl051Y0ALHa3rOYnj6ZsUAFq6UZq/IVKOY+x9/lA6gUaqwy+CwNupjFt5cS WDBCQaUPKJvRlL8cAPjFhsZ96gIYOpiG8SjWaMSZKu/A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=+h1l1i DG5Ml5DOimj/ZFW17QGPmkUIulrLPN3CkRfqk=; b=lT9nDIMqSpGwepX6E68PYO MkWclRBj9OwvzSS0RL4LgPrLYagLUNXG+HoxxcYwXnmo5pgg2mbxX5+Xr+1ZNX/9 In5IJzz3d6qFHVTi6hzAMaRHDcsY0SBdrlGg3PkMUA6pXbScuG0dJQD0VozcgqC2 sdnTJFSk7Z6TQCfY+wF+H8m8zpX8CCYh5eqg9naTG7QmOhDudli/BCD47gWVaItP nhNMMYtsoY8xhU5tHBX9xB0Jo1eQHjTnLFI8QYAS3kX4MtoRWX4HcbXzLpykaLCe iCOxFB+yn2bgV6yMR3/YE5iNYHx6s9d5iOOjSpeLaBXOMfAufiPjS/QHpUhJ8Mhg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudeguddgudeitdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffujghffgffkfggtgesghdtreertderjeenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhi uhhsuceurghkkhgvuceomhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecukfhppe ekgedrvddtvddrieekrdejheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 00A7730624CC; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:32:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Maxim Cournoyer , Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#40079: emacs-elpy-1.31.0: failed to build In-Reply-To: <87tv2iisvw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <170df3c9d14.f2220d0233452.7833229319796639139@zoho.com> <87d0969ae6.fsf@devup.no> <87v9mylmd7.fsf@elephly.net> <87tv2iisvw.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:32:25 +0100 Message-ID: <877dze7j46.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40079 Cc: sirgazil , 40079@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> sirgazil via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: >>> >>>> I couldn't upgrade the packages in my user profile because "emacs-elpy= " check phase fails.=20 >>>> >>>> >>>> ## Steps to reproduce >>>> >>>> 1. guix pull >>>> 2. guix build emacs-elpy >>>> >>>> >>>> ## Unexpected result >>>> >>>> >>>> The output of the check phase: >>>> >>>> --------------------------- >>>> starting phase `check' >>>> >>>> Can=E2=80=99t guess python-indent-offset, using defaults: 4 >>> >>> This seems to stem from the update of 'python-black' in >>> 5f603fab23e7df7e7b76566b3add24b65e92f807. Reverting that commit makes >>> this package build. >>> >>> @Ricardo: Any objections to reverting the commit? >> >> I=E2=80=99d rather not revert but add an older variant of python-black f= or elpy. > > Perhaps the issue would vanish if we move to Elpy 1.32? I had started > packaging it, but hit some issues. In any case I'm sure sirgazil is not the only user of this package, so we should try and find a resolution quickly. As a side note, this bug report could have been easily prevented by building the few packages listed by 'guix refresh -l python{,2}-black' before pushing! Not to single out Ricardo here (I forget this too occasionally), but I expect contributors to do this in general and think we should keep a low threshold for reverting breaking commits. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl51RHkACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPptigf/WJLiOsiK4VFKYN//2UMwYp5DURKKBRACl7o58dYWpuEKiKffvdXMTllJ B/rcG9fAkilrCjfCfsCT8cC0VLpgHee6OwA7c3ZhStuuJHuTF9iLLbnO/k6kzarO stU4h0s79JzcstnfTI0whgkATbo2jbE39lTOn8cyWW6facdDljFfKcgte26hsuas //LXZCUAiIx/x4oAJQWBOYYOXJf2v9B50+5B8kCWTd5mbSDkBsjxmCVg8VmVRup6 pEiDl6LgrpfSkONic+Gy90nMdSnFqLsRmeV6PitrJkyY9VbRS0moTLHaq6T4b9uH i+Aw2Go9IrZPBPFxOCr73IxU0cvJ/Q== =3mwz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--