From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 16 22:00:05 2020 Received: (at 39804) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2020 02:00:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jE1WX-00035G-4j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:00:05 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:37821) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jE1WV-00034I-Sz for 39804@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:00:04 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id l20so16171560qtp.4 for <39804@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:00:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=/xpb9PxcllyhnEZzVd9zDpG/Tyk+SODeLXlWDDvmlxU=; b=r8J7YrxsZEFnhyaVgxV8mprdJpOkjMNvCWU+fTySwoukA8lros8Mz4F401WcKVKo8E afEQZDgpwW2Zb+DnIBsBqJ6AnW7NMgQr3fBZaqCFnu/9SPihqARTFkZnHSzr19J2NHqO ccr+giuLdXYqx4lMTbu1u06zvyuUWry5FEEwDBKbV0b5EtJjKyR0YDq2Lq2fOrnlpBKc jr9kCIVNVNRuRtL4D75N9/B5wPJTIOr6tnYjSneXMl3hzEdA3TX3+bu/AYcYhUHH9TbR k4c13Hib4oFd9058euqz5OnIVKQXDEZxD9qjcqAioUBg+iUn1rJDAMMTtMmr4UYCBgHr ZQ6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=/xpb9PxcllyhnEZzVd9zDpG/Tyk+SODeLXlWDDvmlxU=; b=ShV628r3BIdpVIK4KKjyQkLzrlBOD68IN651wIDJrWoaTV5XYHNzaL7boi8SSGds1H aFsTfVot+T5NJ3WcsQnUBhE1iqlsR5rKYsL07rtgkPECT43som5ypRnfDa8tc3rMIMsr le1fSN3U1LJ8u5mj+gsmIHlJp381iW34KHHV44yTc3gQ46ly1CaYDkYxvRPG8uvDxDoJ /IifucrbWmxMeR1mrF2k1nVmfBcaZesXzQM0CM+CPZCs981tRx/PJXn2gfzzzXyjjnI5 0iSdF+SfXkzuncLhYPNQc0q2C/25tDp38wVD4P320ysG9x6JrnfV5OY1CNw4MfKekVhK ruLw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1f9FmtXau83Vt+CLRieNaSJCKnkwnOL5rss2K/9XDCPV9lNlcB JVvd7xEs7rvn8KG5N467ALx8a3Gm X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvhe81ghqKopWCjizsLxsIQBU97RK0QwoLJY7+kCALrUJyWKPoA7kQ0Fk1/MqNJeqaieN2URw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6f70:: with SMTP id u16mr3170922qtv.355.1584410398176; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apteryx (dsl-10-129-121.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.129.121]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d201sm988451qke.59.2020.03.16.18.59.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:59:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Leo Prikler Subject: Re: [bug#39804] [PATCH] gnu: add emacs-exwm-next package (i.e. exwm for emacs-next) References: <87blplqcdd.fsf@web.de> <8736aw8igd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tv3bd6v1.fsf@web.de> <878skn5cys.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d09ukwnn.fsf@gmail.com> <87zhcn35rl.fsf@gmail.com> <3021ddd02db7fe16676875b33c1a404960e21a2e.camel@student.tugraz.at> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:59:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3021ddd02db7fe16676875b33c1a404960e21a2e.camel@student.tugraz.at> (Leo Prikler's message of "Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:48:58 +0100") Message-ID: <874kun68rn.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39804 Cc: Pierre Neidhardt , dario , 39804@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Leo! Leo Prikler writes: > Am Dienstag, den 10.03.2020, 23:54 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: >> Hello Leo, >> >> Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> >> > Leo Prikler writes: >> > >> > > Am Freitag, den 28.02.2020, 09:32 +0100 schrieb Pierre Neidhardt: >> > > > The `#:emacs` field tells the build system which Emacs package >> > > > to use >> > > > to >> > > > build this package. There may be something that not compatible >> > > > between >> > > > our current build system and emacs-next. >> > > > >> > > > I've CC'ed Maxim and Leo, they might know more than me. >> > > This issue should be addressed by #39375, which is currently >> > > waiting to >> > > be pushed to master or staging. >> > >> > If we don't hear back from >> > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39823 in a day or >> > two, I'd >> > be OK with pushing #39375 to master. >> >> There have been no activity or reply on #39823 yet, so feel free to >> push >> the workaround discussed earlier (on the master branch is fine). >> >> Maxim > Following the discussion in 39823, we now have two options. > 1. loading the library in advance as I do. > 2. wrapping our code in `(eval ...)'. > The latter has the advantage of not needing an additional function, but > both require a build system change. > > WDYT? #1 would be best, as it is a general fix, and we can even add a parameter to allow choosing between dynamic vs lexcal evaluation (see the doc for `eval', it takes such a parameter and defaults to dynamical). Maxim