From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 16 05:59:12 2020 Received: (at 39575) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2020 10:59:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j3Hdn-0003xA-Gd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 05:59:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58859) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j3Hdl-0003wp-AC; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 05:59:09 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j3Hdg-0005Cw-2w; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 05:59:04 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=48582 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j3Hde-00087K-Kx; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 05:59:03 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place References: <87y2t7j54n.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeuy2mua.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnehe0zk.fsf@gnu.org> <878sl47t0q.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 28 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 11:59:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Sat, 15 Feb 2020 16:43:46 +0100") Message-ID: <87k14m3iiy.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39575 Cc: 39575@debbugs.gnu.org, 28659@debbugs.gnu.org, Jan Nieuwenhuizen X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi! zimoun skribis: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> Also, one could argue that we=E2=80=99d steer users towards downloading = from our >> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not a strong argument >> since one can easily change the substitute URLs.) > > I am not following the privacy concern. > What do you mean? I mean that by default, someone who=E2=80=99s disabled substitutes (presuma= bly out of security or privacy concerns) would find themself downloading source code from ci.guix.gnu.org instead of various upstream sites. Ludo=E2=80=99.